Brief Increasing Job Quality Through Greater Employer Transparency
Subtitle
Models to Inform Future Action at Scale
Molly M. Scott, Batia Katz, Jessica Shakesprere
Display Date
File
File
Download Report
(224.66 KB)

The Great Resignation during the COVID-19 pandemic has renewed attention to job quality issues. Throughout the pandemic, many workers lost their jobs at least temporarily and some still have heightened concerns about their health safety and difficult working conditions, especially in traditionally low-paying industries such as retail and leisure and hospitality. Nonetheless, we know little about job quality at US companies. Many businesses may have a limited understanding of their own job quality challenges, which can make it difficult for them to attract and retain frontline workers, particularly in the complicated COVID-19 labor market. Having transparent data on firms’ job quality could also be useful to numerous other stakeholders who want to encourage businesses to do better.

Efforts to shine a light on job quality at individual firms are in early stages but increasing. To better understand them, we interviewed six experts, conducted online research, and profiled nine organizations’ efforts. We identified three basic models of job quality transparency efforts: voluntary self-assessment tools, mandated public reporting or disclosures, and public rankings or ratings. This brief describes each approach to job quality transparency identified, summarizes the approaches’ trade-offs, and discusses how they could inform models for job quality expansion in the future.

Research Areas Economic mobility and inequality Workforce
Tags Employment Inequality and mobility Labor force Job markets and labor force Job quality and workplace standards Workers in low-wage jobs Job training Wages and nonwage compensation Worker voice, representation, and power Work supports Workplace and industry studies
Policy Centers Center on Labor, Human Services, and Population