ProjectHealth Profession Opportunity Grants

Project Navigation
  • Project Home
  • HPOG by the Numbers
  • Challenges of Entry-Level Health Care Trainings
  • Changes to Local Service Delivery Systems
  • Data Systems and Performance Management
  • HPOG 2.0 Cost-Benefit Analysis

  • Challenges of Entry-Level Health Care Trainings

    Across both rounds of HPOG, many participants opted for entry-level trainings like CNA programs, which boasted high completion rates. Though on-average participants who completed these programs had employment and earnings increases, the gains were small, and participants who completed no training at all fared as well or better.

    Entry-level trainings tend to be shorter, have higher completion rates, cost less, and lead to in-demand jobs. They were widespread in HPOG and may be an accessible first step for people with low incomes and no prior health care work experience. But completers of these entry-level trainings did not usually obtain family-sustaining earnings, and non–health care entry-level jobs may offer higher pay with no certification requirements.

    Though higher-level health care jobs pay well, only some HPOG participants started at the entry level and ascended to a higher level of health care training. The gap in skills, time commitment, and cost between short and longer trainings may be too large for many participants.

    The following publications explore the pros and cons of entry-level trainings the HPOG program. These findings carry significant equity implications and offer insights for program administrators, educators, and employers: