PROJECTModernizing Our Retirement Programs

• Project Home
• Alternative Measures of Age
• Convert to Alternative Measures of Age
• Convert to Chronological Age
• Case Study: Employment at Older Ages

• Introduction
Convert to Alternative Measures of Age
Convert to Chronological Age
Case Study: Employment at Older Ages

Gains in life expectancy have changed our understanding of aging.

When the Social Security Act of 1935 set the minimum retirement age at 65, the average 65-year-old man could expect to live another 11.9 years. A man retiring at 65 today can expect to live another 18 years or more, an increase that has a sizable impact on retirement policy.

Age in relation to life expectancy matters for many policy research questions beyond retirement, including those concerning health and employment. Life expectancy makes a big difference when asking such questions as whether people are working longer or whether they are getting healthier over time.

To control for the rise in life expectancy, we created two alternative measures of age: the life expectancy age and the relative life expectancy age.

• Life expectancy age. Depending on the research question, measuring age as the distance to the end of life may be more informative than measuring it as the distance from birth (which is what chronological age measures). With this alternative measure, we keep life expectancy fixed.

For example, a 65-year-old woman in 2010 has a life expectancy of 20.2 years. Her equivalent in 1960 would be a 59.2-year-old woman because she also has a life expectancy of 20.2 years.
• Relative life expectancy age. This measure reflects a relative position in the life cycle. With this measure, we look at remaining life expectancy as a share of the life span. We define this as the ratio of a person’s remaining life expectancy to his or her total expected life span (which is age plus life expectancy).

For example, a 65-year-old woman in 2010 with a life expectancy of 20.2 years has a relative life expectancy of 0.24, meaning that her remaining years will make up 24 percent of her life. Her equivalent in 1960 is a 60.9-year-old woman whose life expectancy is 18.9 years and who therefore also has a relative life expectancy of 0.24.

Using these alternative measures of age can fundamentally alter many conclusions in economic and demographic studies of aging and age-related policies.

How to use this tool

Researchers can use this site to easily convert chronological age to the two alternative measurements of age and vice versa. The following pages present interactive charts and downloadable tables that show the relationship between different measures of age. We also offer a case study that uses these alternative measures to look at employment over time.

Related publications

How Alternative Measures of Age Can Profoundly Affect Research Conclusions
Damir Cosic and Eugene Steuerle

How Should Social Security Adjust When People Live Longer?
Damir Cosic and Eugene Steuerle

How Would Indexing for Improvements in Life Expectancy Affect Trust Fund Balances?
Damir Cosic and Eugene Steuerle