Journal Article Improving Birth Outcomes and Lowering Costs for Women on Medicaid
Subtitle
Impacts of Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns
Lisa Dubay, Ian Hill, Bowen Garrett, Fredric Blavin, Emily M. Johnston, Embry M. Howell, Justin W. Morgan, Brigette Courtot, Sarah Benatar, Caitlin Cross-Barnet
Display Date
Fact sheets

The federal Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns initiative supported alternative approaches to prenatal care, enhancing service delivery through the use of birth centers, group prenatal care, and maternity care homes. Using propensity score reweighting to control for medical and social risks, we evaluated the impacts of Strong Start’s models on birth outcomes and costs by comparing the experiences of Strong Start enrollees to those of Medicaid-covered women who received typical prenatal care. We found that women who received prenatal care in birth centers had lower rates of preterm and low-birthweight infants, lower rates of cesarean section, and higher rates of vaginal birth after cesarean than did the women in the comparison groups. Improved outcomes were achieved at lower costs. There were few improvements in outcomes for participants who received group prenatal care, although their costs were lower in the prenatal period, and no improvements in outcomes for participants in maternity care homes.

This article appears in Health Affairs Vol. 39, No. 6 (2020).

Research and Evidence Health Policy Family and Financial Well-Being
Expertise Reproductive and Maternal Health Aging, Medicare, and Long-Term Care Population Health and Health Inequities
Tags Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program  Maternal, child, and reproductive health