Brief How to Launch a Supportive Housing Pay for Success Initiative
Madeline Brown, Ruth Gourevitch, Martha M. Galvez
Display Date
Download Report
(640.72 KB)

Permanent supportive housing helps solve our country’s homelessness crisis by improving housing stability and reducing the use of public services. The permanent supportive housing approach is backed up by promising evidence, but it can face barriers to implementation because of a lack of political will and budgetary constraints. Some local governments are exploring a financing model called pay for success (PFS), which shifts the financial risk from traditional funders (typically a government) to alternative investors, such as foundations or banks. As of 2018, PFS had funded seven supportive housing interventions.

Related project page:
Getting the Most Out of Your Community’s Administrative Data

This brief was revised October 11, 2019. Box 3 on page 14 was changed to better explain the Denver SIB project and to correct and expand the list of data sources.

Research Areas Nonprofits and philanthropy Housing
Tags Homelessness
Policy Centers Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center Research to Action Lab
Research Methods Performance measurement and management
Related content
Media Name: understanding_community_resources_a_tool_for_data_landscaping.jpg
Groups interested in launching collaborative interventions that span different service sectors need to find ways to build trust and share data and insights. Gathering and analyzing administrative data across agencies and programs can be enormously powerful. Sharing administrative data can help gr...
Media Name: developing_a_collaborative_planning_team.jpg
A collaborative planning team (CPT) is essential for managing the data-related aspects of a project, including those funded through Pay for Success (PFS) or another performance-based financing structure. A CPT is composed of stakeholders with access to administrative data from multiple service sy...
Brief Assessing Feasibility Studies

Pay for success (PFS) shifts the risk of funding a program from traditional funders (usually a government) to investors that are repaid if the intervention achieves predetermined outcomes. PFS doesn’t work for all programs or in all contexts (Milner et al. 2016).

Media Name: guidance_on_collecting_administrative_data_for_pfs_proj.jpg
Administrative data—that is, the information collected by governments and organizations about the people they serve—are a rich resource for strengthening programs and services. But accessing and using such data from the different systems and agencies that house them is often difficult. Moreover, ...