This summary provides an overview of evaluation for direct cash programs. It describes reasons for conducting an evaluation, evaluation methodologies, and key considerations for designing useful and effective evaluations in the direct cash context.
Why This Matters
Many states and localities across the United States have implemented some form of direct cash program in which money is provided directly to individuals or families as a public benefit. Evaluation can help these states and localities understand if direct cash programs are having the desired impact and how the programs can be improved, so they can spend money efficiently and effectively on programs that work. Evaluations can also generate community buy-in and help inform other states and localities interested in implementing similar programs.
Key Takeaways
States and localities can choose from a wide variety of evaluation methodologies for their direct cash programs, including experimental and quasi-experimental methods, qualitative and mixed methods, social network analysis, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis, rapid cycle evaluation, and case studies. When designing an evaluation, program planners should consider the following questions:
- How does evaluation fit into the program’s structure, timeline, and funding?
- What are the theory of change and desired outcomes for the program?
- Which metrics should the evaluation measure?
- How should the evaluation engage research, administrative, and community partners?
