State and Local Backgrounders Homepage
The federal earned income tax credit (EITC) provides a refundable credit to taxpayers based on their income and family circumstances (such as marital status and number of children). In 2023, 31 states and the District of Columbia additionally offer a state EITC. Most state credits are calculated as a percentage of the federal credit.
- How do state EITCs differ?
- How are states reforming the EITC?
- Can states that don’t tax income offer an EITC?
- How did the American Rescue Plan affect state EITCs?
- Further reading
How do state EITCs differ?
In 2023, 31 states and the District of Columbia offer a state EITC. Missouri, Utah, and Washington all recently passed legislation to create a state EITC and each state's credit took effect in tax year 2023. North Carolina eliminated its state EITC in 2014.
Data: View and download each state's EITC as a percentage of the federal credit
State EITCs are refundable, like the federal credit, in all but four states: Missouri, Ohio, South Carolina, and Utah. If a refundable credit exceeds a taxpayer’s state income tax liability, the taxpayer receives the excess amount as a payment from the state. In that way, a refundable EITC can offset other state taxes paid by low-income working families, such as general sales taxes. In contrast, a nonrefundable EITC can only offset state income tax liability. As a result, a nonrefundable EITC provides far smaller benefits than a refundable credit for most EITC-eligible households because those household typically have little or no state income tax liability (i.e., they have low earnings and other deductions and credits reduce or eliminate the household’s taxable income before it can benefit from a nonrefundable EITC).
All but three states with a credit set their EITC as a percentage of the federal credit. In tax year 2023, state credits as a percentage of the federal EITC range from a refundable 3 percent in Montana to a nonrefundable 125 percent in South Carolina. However, because South Carolina’s credit is nonrefundable, most EITC-eligible households earn little or no benefit from the state’s credit even though it has a high match rate. Among states with a refundable EITC as a percentage of the federal credit, the highest match rates are in the District of Columbia (70 percent), Maryland (45 percent), and New Jersey (40 percent).
State earned income tax credits as percentage of federal credit, tax year 2023
- California: calculated based on income
- Colorado: 25%
- Connecticut: 30.5%
- Delaware: 4.5% (or 20% nonrefundable)
- District of Columbia: 70% (100% for childless workers)
- Hawaii: 20%
- Illinois: 20%
- Indiana: 10%
- Iowa: 15%
- Kansas: 17%
- Louisiana: 5%
- Maine: 25% (50% for childless workers)
- Maryland: 45% (100% for childless workers)
- Massachusetts: 30%
- Michigan: 6%
- Minnesota: calculated as a percentage of income
- Missouri: 10% (nonrefundable)
- Montana: 3%
- Nebraska: 10%
- New Jersey: 40%
- New Mexico: 25%
- New York: 30%
- Ohio: 30% (nonrefundable)
- Oklahoma: 5%
- Oregon: 9% (12% for families with dependents under the age of three)
- Rhode Island: 15%
- South Carolina: 125% (nonrefundable)
- Utah: 15% (nonrefundable)
- Vermont: 38%
- Virginia: 15% (or 20% nonrefundable)
- Washington: calculated as a percentage of income
- Wisconsin: 4% one child; 11% two children; and 34% three or more children
Sources: State tax codes and Tax Credits for Working Families
Wisconsin's EITC uses the federal rules but the match rate depends on the number of qualified children: it is 4 percent of the federal credit for filers with one child, 11 percent for filers with two children, and 34 percent for filers with three or more children. Wisconsin filers without qualifying children cannot claim the state credit. Similarly, Oregon follows the federal rules but offers a higher match rate for filers with children younger than three.
The three states that do not use the federal EITC rules for calculating their state EITC are California, Minnesota, and Washington.
California’s EITC phases in dollar for dollar with the filers’ income until it hits a maximum value and then phases out completely at $30,000 of income (for all filing types), which is lower than the federal income eligibility levels. The maximum California EITC for filers with children is roughly 47 percent of the maximum federal credit, but the California and federal calculations differ.
Minnesota also uses a state-specific calculation for its EITC, but its rules more closely mirror the federal EITC calculations. The Minnesota EITC is roughly 37 percent of the federal EITC, but because it is not a simple match calculation, this estimated match varies for different households.
Washington, which does not levy an individual income tax, will give filers a set credit amount based on family size ($300, $600, $900, or $1,200) and then reduce the size of the credit based on the household’s federal income when its credit takes effect in 2023.
How are states reforming the EITC?
Increasingly, states are reforming state EITC rules so that state credits assist workers who largely miss out on the benefits of the federal EITC. Specifically, current state reforms typically benefit childless workers and undocumented workers.
Childless workers include both adults without children and those with children who live with (and are thus on the tax return of) another parent or guardian. Relatively few childless workers are eligible for the federal EITC (because the income eligibility limit for these workers is lower than for workers with children) and those who are eligible receive only a fraction of the benefits available to workers with children. Because most states provide their state credit as a match of the federal credit, state EITCs also provide limited benefits to childless workers.
However, in 2014, the District of Columbia increased its match for childless workers to 100 percent of the federal EITC (the match for filers with children was 40 percent at the time) and expanded the range of eligible income for these filers beyond the federal limits (so some childless filers were eligible for the District's EITC but not the federal EITC). Maine and Maryland have also increased their EITC match specifically for workers without qualifying children.
Additionally, Colorado, California, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New Mexico have all made some childless workers younger than age 25 eligible for their state EITC. Only childless workers ages 25 to 64 are generally eligible for the federal EITC.
The federal rules also require every member of the filing household to have a valid Social Security number to claim the EITC. Filers without a Social Security number, typically undocumented workers, instead file taxes with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) . For example, if the children in a household have a Social Security number but the parents file with an ITIN the household cannot claim the federal EITC. In 2020, California and Colorado became the first states to allow ITIN filers to claim their state’s EITC. The District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington have also made ITIN filers eligible for their state EITC.
Can states that don’t tax income offer an EITC?
In 2021, Washington became the first state without an individual income tax to enact a state EITC. Once the credit takes effect in 2023, eligible Washington residents will file an application to the state for the credit along with their federal individual income tax return. Filers who are eligible for the federal EITC are also eligible for the Washington EITC, with the state credit amount based on the filer's income and family size.
What is the earned income tax credit?
Tax Policy Center (2021)
Who Benefited from 2022's Many State Tax Cuts and What is in Store for 2023?
Richard C. Auxier and David Weiner(2023)
How Post-Pandemic Tax Cuts Can Affect Racial Equity
Richard C. Auxier (2022)
How Increasing the Federal EITC and CTC Could Affect State Taxes
Elaine Maag and David Weiner (2021)
Extending the California Earned Income Tax Credit to Postsecondary Students
Elaine Maag and Nikhita Airi (2021)
District of Columbia Shows How to Expand the EITC For Childless Workers
Richard C. Auxier (2019)
Who Benefits from Expanding the EITC or CTC?
Elaine Maag (2018)
Upward Mobility and State-Level EITCs Evaluating California’s Earned Income Tax Credit
Kim S. Rueben, Frank Sammartino, and Kirk J. Stark (2017)