A Nonpartisan Economic and Social Policy Research Organization
Research
see the latest publications
Browse by Author
Browse by Topics
About UI

Family Well-Being

 

Publications on Family Well-Being

Viewing 1-5 of 206. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

An Economic Framework and Selected Proposals for Demonstrations Aimed At Strengthening Marriage, Employment, and Family Functioning Outcomes (Research Report)
Author(s): Robert I. Lerman, Gregory Acs, Anupa BirPosted to Web: April 28, 2008

The increasing recognition of the importance of marriage for the social and economic well-being of children has led to demonstrations aimed at strengthening and stimulating healthy marriages. The next step is to ensure that factors closely linked with healthy marriages are addressed as well. This paper brings together research findings and policy ideas about the interactions between marriage, employment, and family functioning. It presents a framework and proposes several demonstrations aimed at improving employment and family outcomes for disadvantaged populations. The appendix reviews an extensive body of research on specific linkages between marriage, employment, and family functioning.

Publication Date: December 01, 2007Availability: HTML | PDF

Determinants of Asset Building (Series/Poor Finances: Assets and Low Income Households)
Author(s): Sondra Beverly, Michael Sherraden, Min Zhan, Trina R. Williams-Shanks, Yunju Nam, Reid CramerPosted to Web: April 15, 2008

This report provides a policy-oriented conceptual framework that has the potential to explain saving and asset accumulation across the entire population and to account for the low levels of saving and asset accumulation in the low-income population. The report also reviews empirical evidence that supports or challenges this framework.

Publication Date: April 07, 2008Availability: HTML | PDF

New Findings on the Benefits and Limitations of Assisted Housing Mobility (Commentary)
Author(s): Susan J. PopkinPosted to Web: April 14, 2008

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) launched the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) demonstration in 1994 in five cities: Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. MTO targeted families living in some of the nation’s poorest, highest-crime communities and used housing subsidies to offer them a chance to move to lower-poverty neighborhoods. Research on the families conducted in 2002 raised some important questions about the impact of the program. Findings from the follow up Three-City Study of MTO, in 2004 and 2005, answer some of the questions but also highlight the complexity of the MTO experience and the limitations of a relocation-only strategy in being able to bring about fundamental changes in the lives of very low income families.

Publication Date: April 09, 2008Availability: HTML

Assisted Housing Mobility and the Success of Low-Income Minority Families: Lessons for Policy, Practice, and Future Research (Research Brief)
Author(s): Margery Austin Turner, Xavier de Souza BriggsPosted to Web: March 20, 2008

The federal Moving to Opportunity program (MTO) was designed to help poor minority families move from distressed, high poverty neighborhoods to better locations, thereby improving their quality of life and long term chances for well-being. Low income families living in concentrated poverty face a variety of challenges to their safety, health, and economic health, including poor schools, high crime and unemployment. This brief examines areas where the MTO program helped movers with those challenges, areas still problematic even after moving, and factors affecting those outcomes and considers policy implications for the next generation of assisted housing mobility initiatives.

Publication Date: March 01, 2008Availability: HTML | PDF

How Households Expect to Cope in a Financial Emergency (Article/Opportunity and Ownership Facts)
Author(s): Lynette A. Rawlings, Kerstin GentschPosted to Web: March 04, 2008

How households cope with financial emergencies depends largely on the resources at their disposal. Differential access to good financial options affects how much households pay for credit in a time of need, which can vary substantially. Using data from the Making Connections Cross-Site Survey (2002–2004), we examine how households with incomes over $30,000 and those with incomes below $30,000 would respond in a financial emergency and find that in general, higher-income households were more likely to use conventional methods while lower-income households were more likely to use alternative (and often more expensive) methods to pay unexpected bills.

Publication Date: February 29, 2008Availability: HTML | PDF

 Next Page >>
Email this Page