|
Publication Date: April 30, 1998 Other Availability: Permanent Link: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=900094
WASHINGTON, D.C.In a ground-breaking study released today, Urban Institute demographers find that the vast majority of New York State's foreign-born population is legal84 percentand that they pay $18.2 billion in taxes, 15.5 percent of the state's total. Average tax payments are close to, but somewhat lower than, those of natives$6,300 versus $6,500, reflecting the somewhat lower incomes of legal immigrants. The Urban Institute study "Immigrants in New York: Their Legal Status, Incomes, and Taxes," by Jeffrey S. Passel and Rebecca L. Clark, confirms that New York state legal immigrants are adapting well over time. The longer they have been here, the higher their incomes and average tax payments, the study finds. "Legal immigrants who have been here for 15 years or more," notes co-author Clark, "have, on average, higher incomes than natives." Children of immigrants also do wellin New York, adults who have at least one immigrant parent have virtually the same average income and tax payments as adults whose parents were both born in the United States. In both focus and methodology, the Urban Institute study corrects for the significant limitations of previous fiscal impact studies of immigrants. Many of these analyses have focused primarily on the cost side of the equation; have failed to make distinctions among different groups of immigrants; or have inconsistently attributed costs and contributions when comparing immigrants with the native-born population. This has left policymakers without the information they need to address policy concerns such as the appropriate levels of immigration and immigrant eligibility for government programs. "Immigrants in New York" is the first study to estimate the number of legal immigrants in New York State and to distinguish among them according to their legal status. The study also calculates incomes and taxes for the separate groups and compares them to the contributions of the native-born. The researchers show there are significant differences between legal immigrants who often thrive in the United Statesnaturalized citizens, regularly admitted "green card" immigrants, and resident foreign nationals such as diplomats and studentsand refugees, the legal immigrants who have the most trouble adjusting. "Such distinctions are critical," says Passel, "because eligibility for government benefits and socioeconomic characteristics vary significantly by specific legal status."
Key Findings The demographers used data from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Office of Refugee Resettlement, and the U.S. Bureau of the Census for their population estimates. They used the March 1995 Current Population Survey as modified by the Urban Institute's TRIM2 computer simulation, the 1996 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey, and a variety of administrative data sources for their income and tax estimates. Among their key findings: Population Size
Incomes and Taxes
Policy and Research Implications Passel and Clark suggest that the following steps be taken to improve the information and public dialogue on immigrants and the policies affecting them. More Sophisticated Use of Data At a minimum, separate fiscal impact assessments should be done for legal and illegal immigrants and for each group of legal immigrants. This is particularly relevant where refugees and LPRs are concerned:
LPRs: Legal permanent residents are by far the largest group of legal immigrants and the focus of most debates over immigration policy. But most analyses of the impacts of immigrants are based on Census Bureau data sets that do not distinguish these "green card" immigrants from others such as refugees and undocumented aliens who have substantially different characteristics. Greater Analytic Consistency and Longer-Term Perspective Adult second-generation Americansthe U.S.-born offspring of immigrantshave the same average incomes as the adult descendants of natives. Most analysts attribute the costs of second-generation American children to immigrants but attribute their contributions to natives. Counting second-generation Americans as immigrants when they are young and costly, but as natives when they start contributing taxes, biases analyses toward finding that immigrants are a fiscal burden. Recent welfare laws severely limit most immigrants' access to government benefits during their early years in the United States, when their incomes are lowest. Welfare reform legislation bars new immigrants from TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) and Medicaid for their first five years and from Food Stamps and SSI (Supplemental Security Income) until they become citizens. Refugees face a seven-year wait for eligibility for public assistance. It is not yet clear whether these new restrictions will encourage economic success or make adjustment for immigrants more difficult. Federal-State Balance of Burdens and Responsibilities Underlying much of the concern about fiscal impacts of legal immigrants is the historic tension over cost-sharing between the federal government and the states. The bulk of tax contributions from legal immigrants and natives goes to the federal government, while most of the costs remain with states and localities, which underwrite primary and secondary education. Recent welfare laws have exacerbated the situation by shifting the burden of caring for new immigrants to the states. This imbalance fuels continuing debate over the services available to legal immigrants and the responsibility for the cost of these services. Ultimately, citizens will have to decide whether to raise state and local taxes, to petition for federal relief, or to curtail these services. The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research organization established in Washington, D.C., in 1968. Its objectives are to sharpen thinking about society's problems and efforts to solve them, improve government decisions and their implementation, and increase citizens' awareness about important public choices. To order "Immigrants in New York: Their Legal Status, Incomes, and Taxes," by Jeffrey S. Passel and Rebecca L. Clark, ($13.50) please call the Urban Institute Publications Office at (202) 261-5885. Related Publications
Other Publications by the AuthorsThe nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org. If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||