Rebuilding After Hurricanes Katrina and RitaPublication Date: August 14, 2007 Permanent Link: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411514 The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full paper in PDF format. AbstractThe devastation and displacement of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to families’ lives and to communities poses a unique set of affordable housing challenges in order for the area to recover. So far, rebuilding has been slow and the prospects for the future are uncertain. Although everyone who was displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita faces significant housing challenges, the needs of low- and moderate-income renters warrant far more attention than they have thus far received. Without affordable rental options, many original residents will not be able to return to their communities, lower income households will face the greatest uncertainty and hardship, and the region’s economic recovery is likely to be undermined by the lack of critical workers. This report is intended to serve as a resource to help inform and invigorate public debate about affordable rental housing policies and to present a set of promising programs and practices that would expand the availability of permanent, affordable rental housing in the ongoing effort to recover from the storms. IntroductionLouisiana needs affordable housing for both renters and homeowners in order to recover fully and fairly from the devastation and displacement of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Even before the storms, decent affordable housing was in short supply and many low-income families and individuals faced housing hardship. But the hurricanes—and the flooding that followed—left the state with a severe housing shortage. In the greater New Orleans region, for example, almost half the housing stock was damaged or destroyed1. So far, rebuilding has been slow and the prospects for the future are uncertain. 1Estimates indicate that 36 percent of homeowner stock and 56 percent of rental stock was damaged or destroyed. (End of excerpt. The entire paper is available in PDF format.) Related Publications
Other Publications by the AuthorsThe nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org. If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687. |