A Typology of Benefit Designs

Research Report

A Typology of Benefit Designs

Abstract

Payment reform promises to substitute value for volume, but value- and volume-based approaches typically are implemented together. All payment methods have strengths and weaknesses, and how they affect the behavior of health care providers depends on their operational design features and how they interact with benefit design. Those seeking greater value for their health care dollar are also turning to innovation in benefit design, which typically implements more than one approach at a time. Although payment and benefit design have received significant attention independently, the intersection between the two has received little. The Urban Institute partnered with Catalyst for Payment Reform to explore how established and proposed payment methods and benefit design options work on their own and together. We also examined how payment and benefit design can be blended to improve health care delivery.

In this report, we develop a new typology of benefit designs under two categories—cost sharing and contingent coverage—and focus only on designs that have the potential to change consumer behavior and its alignment with payment reform.

Related reports and chapters can be found on our project page.

Research Area: 

Centers

To reuse content from Urban Institute, visit copyright.com, search for the publications, choose from a list of licenses, and complete the transaction.