| Home Wall Street Order this Press |
GETTING THE GOVERNMENT New Urban Institute Book Points Way to More Responsive Government
In The Government We Deserve, Eugene Steuerle, Edward Gramlich, Hugh Heclo, and Demetra Smith Nightingale offer a blueprint for changing the direction of American domestic policy and politics. They propose a series of fiscal and political reforms, warning that the federal government has made so many open-ended commitments to programs with automatic growth rates that "it can do very little that is new without reneging on promises it has already made." As co-author Steuerle notes:
"Within three decades ... the pension and health demands of retiring baby boomers, combined with the rising cost of health care and interest on the debt, will eat up close to 100 percent of projected revenues at current tax rates--leaving literally nothing for any other public expenditure." At the same time, widespread public disengagement with political life has left critical policymaking in the hands of professional politicians, image consultants, and powerful interest groups. The result, according to co-author Heclo, is "a government incapable of responding to current needs and a citizenry that has lost a sense of ownership of government." Recognizing Current Needs The first step to effective reform, the authors say, is an evaluation of the forces changing our society. Major trends highlighted in the book include:
A Plan of Action for the Twenty-first Century The Government We Deserve weaves together analyses of issues traditionally addressed as separate, often unrelated concerns and argues that better government requires dealing simultaneously with the economic, family, fiscal, and political changes of our time. In lieu of prescriptions for specific policies, it provides a set of eight goals for reform:
Give social insurance a modern face — Retirement and health policies have large built-in growth based on insurance models that are decades old, says co-author Gramlich: "It's time for a comprehensive assessment of the relative priority of different programs for Americans." Make a government for all ages — A government for all ages would put retirement and health programs into the context of overall social needs, including education and opportunities for accumulating wealth. Increase everyone's chances to build financial security — By creating opportunities to accumulate assets for financial security, especially among the most disadvantaged, society can give everyone a greater stake in the future. We should look to the twenty-first century as a time to strike a balance between security and opportunity. Stress learning over a lifetime — Lifetime learning is a key to developing and maintaining the human capital vital in a technological economy that so richly rewards both knowledge and education. We should not just improve education, but also extend and equalize educational opportunities at all stages of life. Provide children with access to greater adult or parental supervision, guidance, and mentoring — While research shows that children are most likely to get in trouble when unsupervised and that children's relationships with adults are essential for their healthy development, government programs continue to neglect the fundamental need of each child for adult stimulus, nurturing, and supervision. Support the modern family — Many government tax and expenditure policies, built around stereotypes that do not fit modern families, are neither equitable nor efficient, and they often contradict important values in society. For example, tax policy puts low-income individuals at a disadvantage by reducing their combined income up to 30 percent when they marry. Foster a new democratic citizenship — Revitalizing citizenship depends upon each of us as citizens trying to do the right thing to build trust in our civic life. Doing so requires improving media communication, nourishing deliberative and thoughtful public opinion, and supporting institutions that encourage responsible journalism and civic education. In sum, the authors say that broad domestic policy reform is like a three-legged stool. It requires establishing priorities based on current, not past, economic and family needs; releasing the ever- tightening yoke of prior fiscal commitments; and reinvigorating the governing process.
C. Eugene Steuerle, senior fellow at the Urban Institute, has worked for four U.S. presidents on social security, health, and tax reforms. He is a former senior Treasury official. Edward M. Gramlich, a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, recently served as chair of the Advisory Council on Social Security. Hugh Heclo, Robinson professor of public affairs at George Mason University, is an expert on social policy. He is a former professor at Harvard and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Demetra Smith Nightingale is director of the Welfare and Training Research Program at the Urban Institute. She is a nationally recognized expert on issues related to poverty.
The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research organization. Its objectives are to increase citizens' awareness about critical public choices and improve government policy decisions. The Government We Deserve: Responsive Democracy and Changing Expectations, by C. Eugene Steuerle, Edward N. Gramlich, Hugh Heclo, and Demetra Smith Nightingale, Spring 1998, 150 pages, ISBN 0-87766-676-8 $18.95 Order from University Press of America: 800-462-6420. Comments and questions may be sent via email. |