urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Reconciling the Massachusetts and Federal Individual Mandates for Health Insurance: A Comparison of Policy Options

Read complete document: PDF


PrintPrint this page
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageE-mail
Document date: December 10, 2012
Released online: December 10, 2012
The 2006 Massachusetts health reform law increased insurance coverage and improved access to care for residents, in part due to the law’s individual mandate. An individual mandate is also a component of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), though its design differs from Massachusetts' mandate in many ways. The implementation of the federal mandate in 2014 raises complex questions about the interaction of the two requirements. We analyze three basic policy options available to the state, assessing their implications for residents and each policy option's ability to satisfy core policy objectives.


Topics/Tags: | Health/Healthcare


Usage and reprints: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site and may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact publicaffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute.

Email this Page