urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

How Do Drug Courts Work?

Read complete document: PDF


PrintPrint this page
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageE-mail
Document date: November 05, 2009
Released online: March 05, 2010

Abstract

NIJ's Multi-Site Evaluation of Adult Drug Courts will report on a mediation analysis to empirically test theoretical pathways to desistance. The analysis considers the theoretical mechanisms through which drug court practices are meant to impact outcomes and how such pathways can be operationalized. A path model is proposed that delineates how drug-court practices affect modifications in behaviors and attitudes, and how these changes affect outcomes. Proposed mediators include changes in: perceived risk and reward (deterrence), perceived legitimacy, and motivation to alter one's behavior. The analysis will suggest the pathways that are most crucial to desistance and the most effective drug-court components that impact these pathways.


The text below is an excerpt from the complete presentation. Read the Full Presentation in PDF format.

Presentation Overview

  • Background
  • Present Study (MADCE)
  • Proposed Model
  • Analytic Strategy
  • Results
  • Next Steps

Background

  • Prior research shows drug courts work
  • Few studies show how; key exception below
    — Gottfredson, Kearley, Najaka, and Rocha. 2007. "How Drug Treatment Courts Work: An Analysis of Mediators." Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44(1): 3-35.

Multisite Adult Drug Court Evaluation

  • Study overview

Description of Variables

  • Baseline variables
    — Drug court participation
    — Controls: age, race, gender, education, income, married/relationship, income, minor children, primary drug of choice, prior arrests
  • Moderators
    — Number of drug tests, court appearances, case management contacts, sanctions, days in treatment, depression, ASPD, family drug use
  • Mediators
    — Deterrence, attitude toward judge, readiness for change
  • Outcome
    — Drug use

(End of excerpt. The Entire Presentation is available in PDF format.)



Topics/Tags: | Crime/Justice


Usage and reprints: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site and may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact publicaffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute.

Email this Page