Abstract
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides low-income households with electronic benefits to purchase food in grocery stores. People residing on Indian reservations, and households with American Indians and Alaska Natives residing near reservations, or in certain areas of Oklahoma, may have a food assistance option besides SNAP—the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), which provides a monthly package of commodities. This report combines findings from site visits to seven reservations that participate in FDPIR with analysis of administrative and survey data to compare the two programs with regard to eligibility, participation, administration, and possible effects on health.
The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the Full Report in PDF format.
Introduction
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the Food
Stamp Program (FSP), provides low-income households with electronic benefits that can be used
to purchase food in grocery stores and supermarkets.1 None of the program's many eligibility
requirements are based on race or ethnicity.
People of any race residing on Indian reservations, and households with American
Indians and Alaska Natives residing off but near reservations, or in certain areas of Oklahoma,
may have a food assistance option besides SNAP/FSP.2 They may be able to participate in the
Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), which provides a monthly package
of commodities. Eligibility requirements for FDPIR are similar, but not identical, to those for
SNAP/FSP. Households cannot participate in both FDPIR and SNAP/FSP in the same month, so
those who are eligible for both programs must choose between them.
This report combines findings from site visits to seven reservations that participate in
FDPIR with analysis of administrative and survey data to compare the two programs with regard
to eligibility, participation, administration, and possible effects on health and nutrition. The
information and analysis in the report are meant to help the USDA, Congress, and tribal
governments understand the contributions and limitations of each program, and how they do or
do not work together and with other programs on the reservations.
The subsections immediately below provide background on the origins of FDPIR, its
current operations, and recent trends. We then trace the broad outlines of the comparison
between FDPIR and SNAP/FSP, review earlier studies, and lay out our detailed goals and
objectives. Subsequent sections cover research methods, eligibility, participation, program
administration, and health and nutrition. The last section of the main text discusses our
conclusions and their policy implications. The seven analytical site summaries, with illustrative
photos, are attached as an appendix.
(End of excerpt. The entire Report is available in PDF format.)
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.