Abstract
Automatic enrollment, a 401(k) feature that enrolls employees as soon as they become eligible, is growing in popularity because it has been shown to significantly increase pension participation rates. However, higher participation rates increase costs for employers that match employee contributions. This brief evaluates the extent to which firms adjust their 401(k) contributions to offset the higher costs associated with automatic enrollment. We find that employer match rates are 7 percentage points lower among firms with autoenrollment than among those without it, suggesting that automatic enrollment may not promote retirement savings as effectively as some advocates have claimed.
The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full brief in PDF format.
Introduction
Low participation rates limit the effectiveness of
401(k) plans as a reliable source of retirement income.
About one in five workers eligible to participate in
their employer’s 401(k) plans do not enroll (Munnell,
Golub-Sass, and Muldoon 2009). Firms can raise participation
rates by automatically enrolling employees
as soon as they become eligible. However, higher participation
rates increase costs for employers that match
employee contributions, and firms appear to reduce
the rate at which they contribute to 401(k) plans when
they adopt autoenrollment. Autoenrollment, then, will
not necessarily raise future incomes for all eligible
employees.
Autoenrollment
Automatic enrollment is an increasingly popular 401(k)
feature that enrolls employees as soon as they become
eligible. Between 1999 and 2008, the percentage of 401(k)
plans with automatic enrollment increased from 4.2 to
39.6 (PSCA 2008). Madrian and Shea (2001) found that
automatic enrollment increased participation rates of
new hires from 49 to 86 percent, leading academics,
policymakers, and employers to embrace automatic
enrollment as a solution to low plan participation and
a way to increase retirement savings (U.S. GAO 2009).
The 2006 Pension Protection Act (especially the release
of related Internal Revenue Service rules in March
2009) will likely further boost the share of employers
offering automatic enrollment.
Effects of Autoenrollment on an Employer Match
Most companies with automatic enrollment match their
employees’ contributions (Beshears et al. 2009), usually
by contributing 50 cents for every dollar contributed by
employees, up to 6 percent of salary. Unless employers
cut costs in some way, the increase in pension participation
generated by automatic enrollment will increase
employers’ cost of offering a match. In fact, companies
often report that the cost of matching is the most important
barrier to adding automatic enrollment (Bruno 2008).
We find evidence that firms reduce their match rate
to offset the costs of automatic enrollment. Our statistical
model shows that match rates are 7 percentage points
lower among firms with automatic enrollment than
among those without it, after we control for industry, plan
size, and whether the firm also offers a defined benefit
plan (figure 1). For firms with 60 percent or more participation
before automatic enrollment, we estimate that a
7 percentage point reduction in match rates would offset
at least 42 percent of the cost increase associated with
autoenrollment.
Of course, these results might indicate that firms
with low match rates are more likely to adopt automatic
enrollment because their matching expenses are already
low, not that firms cut their match rates in response to
autoenrollment. Either way, the results imply that autoenrollment
may not promote retirement savings as
effectively as some have claimed. We need additional
research on how employers set their match level to better
understand how they might respond to automatic
enrollment.
(End of excerpt. The entire brief is available in PDF format.)
Corresponding Paper
Will Automatic Enrollment Reduce Employer Contributions to 401(k) Plans?
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.