urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Does Autoenrollment Affect Employer Contributions?

Publication Date: December 08, 2009
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411996
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

Abstract

Automatic enrollment, a 401(k) feature that enrolls employees as soon as they become eligible, is growing in popularity because it has been shown to significantly increase pension participation rates. However, higher participation rates increase costs for employers that match employee contributions. This brief evaluates the extent to which firms adjust their 401(k) contributions to offset the higher costs associated with automatic enrollment. We find that employer match rates are 7 percentage points lower among firms with autoenrollment than among those without it, suggesting that automatic enrollment may not promote retirement savings as effectively as some advocates have claimed.


The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full brief in PDF format.

Introduction

Low participation rates limit the effectiveness of 401(k) plans as a reliable source of retirement income. About one in five workers eligible to participate in their employer’s 401(k) plans do not enroll (Munnell, Golub-Sass, and Muldoon 2009). Firms can raise participation rates by automatically enrolling employees as soon as they become eligible. However, higher participation rates increase costs for employers that match employee contributions, and firms appear to reduce the rate at which they contribute to 401(k) plans when they adopt autoenrollment. Autoenrollment, then, will not necessarily raise future incomes for all eligible employees.

Autoenrollment

Automatic enrollment is an increasingly popular 401(k) feature that enrolls employees as soon as they become eligible. Between 1999 and 2008, the percentage of 401(k) plans with automatic enrollment increased from 4.2 to 39.6 (PSCA 2008). Madrian and Shea (2001) found that automatic enrollment increased participation rates of new hires from 49 to 86 percent, leading academics, policymakers, and employers to embrace automatic enrollment as a solution to low plan participation and a way to increase retirement savings (U.S. GAO 2009). The 2006 Pension Protection Act (especially the release of related Internal Revenue Service rules in March 2009) will likely further boost the share of employers offering automatic enrollment.

Effects of Autoenrollment on an Employer Match

Most companies with automatic enrollment match their employees’ contributions (Beshears et al. 2009), usually by contributing 50 cents for every dollar contributed by employees, up to 6 percent of salary. Unless employers cut costs in some way, the increase in pension participation generated by automatic enrollment will increase employers’ cost of offering a match. In fact, companies often report that the cost of matching is the most important barrier to adding automatic enrollment (Bruno 2008).

We find evidence that firms reduce their match rate to offset the costs of automatic enrollment. Our statistical model shows that match rates are 7 percentage points lower among firms with automatic enrollment than among those without it, after we control for industry, plan size, and whether the firm also offers a defined benefit plan (figure 1). For firms with 60 percent or more participation before automatic enrollment, we estimate that a 7 percentage point reduction in match rates would offset at least 42 percent of the cost increase associated with autoenrollment.

Of course, these results might indicate that firms with low match rates are more likely to adopt automatic enrollment because their matching expenses are already low, not that firms cut their match rates in response to autoenrollment. Either way, the results imply that autoenrollment may not promote retirement savings as effectively as some have claimed. We need additional research on how employers set their match level to better understand how they might respond to automatic enrollment.

(End of excerpt. The entire brief is available in PDF format.)

Corresponding Paper

Will Automatic Enrollment Reduce Employer Contributions to 401(k) Plans?


Topics/Tags: | Economy/Taxes | Retirement and Older Americans


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page