The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full paper
in PDF format.
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to help both local and national government officials think through
possible strategies for addressing one of the fundamental issues facing Serbian municipalities
today: How do Serbian local governments increase the revenues they need to improve their
public infrastructure while simultaneously creating an environment favorable to private
investment and local economic development? This is a dilemma that local governments face
throughout the world but which is particularly pressing in many developing and transition
countries where local governments must address huge deficits in urban infrastructure without at
the same time over taxing their business communities upon which their future growth depends. It
is also of particular importance in Nis, the third largest city in Serbia and the economic engine of
the southern and least developed part of the country.
Introduction
The purpose of this note is to help both local and national government officials think through
possible strategies for addressing one of the fundamental issues facing Serbian municipalities
today: How do Serbian local governments increase the revenues they need to improve their
public infrastructure while simultaneously creating an environment favorable to private
investment and local economic development?
This is a dilemma that local governments face throughout the world but which is particularly
pressing in many developing and transition countries where local governments must address
huge deficits in urban infrastructure without at the same time over taxing their business
communities upon which their future growth depends. It is also of particular importance in Nis,
the third largest city in Serbia and the economic engine of the southern and least developed part
of the country.
The note is divided into two parts. The first part highlights the most pressing problems
concerning the nature and structure of local government own revenues. Special attention is paid
to the policy issues—both local and national—raised by the devolution of the property tax and
other revenue collecting powers to municipalities. I also discuss the land use and land
development fees; the business sign fee; the self-contribution fee; and utility pricing. I include
utility prices in the discussion because while income earned by utilities from the sale of goods
and services are not general budget revenues of municipalities, they are of critical importance in
helping local governments meet their infrastructure needs. They also directly and indirectly
affect the business community.
The second part of the note looks at these same issues in Nis today. On the one hand, I situate
how Nis is using its own revenue raising powers within the larger context of what seems to be
going on elsewhere in the country. On the other hand, I outline select policy directions designed
to increase Nis’s own revenues and improve the local business environment.
(End of excerpt. The entire
paper is available in PDF format.)
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.