urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Unemployment Insurance during a Recession

Recession and Recovery, No. 2

Publication Date: December 22, 2008
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411808
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full report in PDF format.

Abstract

This brief, part of the Urban Institute's "Recession and Recover" series, examines how the Unemployment Insurance program responds during a recession and how that response may differ in the current recession from its response in the past.


Introduction

State unemployment insurance programs provide weekly unemployment benefits to eligible workers who lose their jobs through no fault of their own. This safety net program is especially important during recessions, when the unemployment rate increases, since it also bolsters consumer spending.

The unemployment rate in November 2008 reached 6.7 percent, which is not unusually high during recessionary periods. However, in the two most recent recessions (1990–91 and 2001), monthly unemployment peaked at just under 8 percent and just over 6 percent, respectively. Most predict that the current recession will peak at over 8 percent.

While over 90 percent of jobs in the United States are covered by unemployment insurance, not all unemployed workers receive benefits. In fact, only 36.3 percent of the unemployed in 2007 received benefits. Some choose not to claim benefits, and others who do apply are found ineligible because they did not earn enough or work long enough before losing their jobs.

States determine a worker’s eligibility based on his or her covered earnings for a 12-month period before being unemployed. Traditionally, this period excluded the three months immediately before unemployment. Many states are trying to increase these workers’ recipiency rate by changing the eligibility, or base, period. Nineteen states have adopted an alternative base period that allows consideration of higher earnings in the most recent three months to determine benefit eligibility.

(End of excerpt. The entire report is available in PDF format.)


Topics/Tags: | Economy/Taxes | Employment | Poverty and Safety Net


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page