urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Workforce Development and the Disadvantaged

New Directions for 2009 and Beyond

Publication Date: September 01, 2008
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411761
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full report in PDF format.

Abstract

The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) officially expired in 2003 but has not yet been reauthorized. With a new administration and Congress due in 2009, what should they consider regarding workforce development and the disadvantaged population? This brief reviews the arguments for a workforce development system, examining both the strengths and weaknesses of the current WIA program. Among the proposals are expanded funding, and planning grants which states could use to target industries and sectors with unmet demands for skilled workers. They would then identify potential "pathways" for different groups of disadvantaged workers to meet those demands.


Introduction

The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Clinton in 1998, replacing the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA). It remains the primary vehicle through which the U.S. Department of Labor funds a range of labor-market services, including job training, for workers. The services provided include some that are universally available, while others are more targeted to particular groups, including the disadvantaged. The legislation formally expired in 2003 and has not been reauthorized since then, but it continues to operate (albeit at reduced levels of funding almost every year).

With a new administration and Congress due in place at the beginning of 2009, this year is a critical time to rethink the nature and extent of services funded under WIA, and especially how they serve disadvantaged workers—both adults and youth. What are the primary limitations of the current approach? Are funding levels adequate for the required goals of the system? How might the many other federal, state, and local sources of funding for workforce development be used more effectively? In a tight budgetary environment, what can be realistically expected?

This brief addresses these questions. It begins with a brief overview of the need for a public workforce system, followed by some discussion of how well WIA meets these needs. Then it outlines what a new system might look like, and what changes in WIA are needed to get there.

(End of excerpt. The entire report is available in PDF format.)


Topics/Tags: | Economy/Taxes | Employment | Families and Parenting | Poverty and Safety Net


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page