urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Comment on "Supporting Work for Low-Income People with Significant Challenges"

Publication Date: July 16, 2008
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411728
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the entire comment in PDF format.


This paper is a response to New Safety Net Paper 5, "Supporting Work for Low-Income People with Significant Challenges" by Pamela Loprest and Karin Martinson.


Loprest and Martinson provide an overview of the issues related to supporting work and provide relevant background on past research and various strategies that have been employed to address the problem of helping low-income people with significant challenges engage in and sustain employment. They find that there is potential for states to develop strategies for addressing the needs of individuals with significant challenges to work, and based on this assessment they discuss and recommend policy changes on three levels:

  • legislative and regulatory changes to existing programs
  • new federal support for programs serving people with multiple challenges
  • longer-term options

In my comments, I will focus primarily on the ideas for policy reform posed by Loprest and Martinson from the perspective of someone who shares their concern about the need and who views the issues as a state administrator who must also be mindful of feasibility and implementation challenges.

To begin, I applaud the authors for focusing on a policy goal of employment for low-income parents rather than a proposal that opts out of the difficult task of assisting those with significant challenges. It would be tempting to return to past policies that tended to exclude these parents from work expectations or requirements. This approach would exclude some families from the opportunity to gain both the financial and nonfinancial benefits of employment. Loprest and Martinson have taken the more difficult yet more productive path of working toward solutions to the challenges these parents face.

(End of excerpt. The entire comment is available in PDF format.)


Topics/Tags: | Employment | Poverty and Safety Net


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page