The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full paper in PDF format.
Many state and local child care subsidy agencies have been redesigning their policies to better meet the needs of the families they serve, and to create more efficient and fiscally responsible systems. These strategies reflect states' growing understanding of the dynamic nature of low-income families' lives and of the challenges they face as they move toward stable employment. This report synthesizes findings from various research projects conducted by the Urban Institute (and other organizations), and lays out a range of policy strategies states are implementing to support eligible families in accessing and retaining child care subsidies.
Low-income families can face numerous challenges as they work toward stable and
gainful employment. Child care subsidies are designed to help them overcome
one major barrier they face—affording child care for their children—as they seek to
become or remain employed. Research suggests that subsidies can play an important
role in this effort, as subsidy use is associated with higher rates of employment and
better employment outcomes (Schaefer, Kreader, and Collins 2006). As such, child care
subsidies—mostly funded through the federal Child Care and Development Fund
(CCDF) with related state funds, and funds that states allocate from their Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs—are a key public investment in a
safety net for America’s working families, and for families moving from welfare to work.
(Appendix A includes a description of the CCDF and some of its key provisions.)
As highlighted in previous Urban Institute studies, however, despite the importance
of subsidies for low-income families, only some families that are eligible for services
receive assistance. This disparity results from a number of factors, including insufficient
funding in some states to serve all families that want services, as well as some families
not wanting or needing assistance. Yet it appears that even when funds are available,
some eligible families that want subsidies do not receive them, families that do receive
them often stay on subsidies for relatively short periods, and some families that do not
stay in the program appear to remain eligible even after they leave (Collins et al. 2000;
Meyers et al. 2002; Grobe, Weber, and Davis 2006). While again multiple factors likely
contribute to these patterns, research suggests that subsidy policies and practices can
contribute to whether some eligible families receive subsidies in the first place, as well as
whether eligible families that receive subsidies are able to retain them over time (Adams,
Snyder, and Sandfort 2002; Shlay et al. 2002). These include policies and practices in
areas such as what families must do to apply for subsidies, to recertify their eligibility,
and to report changes in circumstances that may alter their eligibility, as well as how
often families must take these steps; how easy or difficult their interactions are with the
subsidy agency (Adams et al. 2002); and how agencies define eligibility when families
experience changes in their circumstances (Snyder, Banghart, and Adams 2006).
Designing Subsidy Systems to Meet the Needs of Families
The growing understanding of the importance of these issues has led states and
localities to focus more on identifying ways to improve their services and design their
programs to make it both easier for eligible families to receive services in the first place
and to keep them once they receive them (see, for example, Snyder, Banghart et al. 2006).
In addition to making processes easier for parents, several strategies appear to help
administrators meet other critical program goals, such as reducing staff workload,
keeping program costs down, and reducing improper payments (Snyder, Banghart et al.
2006). Some strategies that better support parents—for example, decreasing paperwork,
simplifying interactions with parents, reducing inadvertent terminations or needless
churning of clients—can also minimize unnecessary procedures that result in
Finally, strategies that help subsidized families retain subsidies also seem likely to
affect CCDF program goals to support child development. While low-income families on
subsidies may change providers while in the system (Grobe et al. 2006), inadvertent
terminations of subsidies can mean at least some children experience disruptions in their care arrangements that would not have otherwise occurred. Given the central role that having a stable relationship with a loving caregiver has on a child’s well-being, minimizing those disruptions is clearly important for child development goals as well.
(End of excerpt. The entire paper is available in PDF format.)
Usage and reprints: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site and may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.
Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute.