The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full brief in PDF format, or view a summary of the seven briefs in this series.
Abstract
Fear of crime has profound implications for residents, causing stress and social isolation; relocation has brought about a dramatic positive impact on residents’ life circumstances. Those residents who left traditional public housing—voucher holders and unassisted renters and homeowners—are now living in neighborhoods that are dramatically safer than their original public housing developments. These improvements in safety have had a profound impact on their quality of life; they can let their children play outside, they are sleeping better, and are feeling less worried and anxious overall. However, those who remain in traditional public housing developments are still living in extremely dangerous circumstances, little better than where they started.
Introduction
The HOPE VI program targeted the nation's
worst public housing—poorly constructed
developments suffering from years
of neglect, where crime and violence were
overwhelming (see text box on page 11).
Exacerbating the problems, most of these
developments were extremely racially
and economically segregated, and located
in neighborhoods nearly as distressed.1
Thousands of vulnerable families lived in
these troubled communities, most because
they had no other alternative. The damage
to the residents who endured—and sometimes
contributed to—these conditions was
profound. Many were victims of the overwhelming
social disorganization, addicted
to drugs, abused or neglected by drugaddicted
parents, killed or injured in the
drug wars, arrested or incarcerated, or
simply traumatized by the stress of coping
with the constant violence and disorder
(Popkin et al. 2000).
Growing up in high-poverty neighborhoods
harms children and adolescents in
many ways, including poor physical and
mental health, risky sexual behavior, and
delinquency.2 In particular, exposure to violence
can have profound—and lingering—
effects on children's mental health and
development (Kilpatrick et al. 2003). Boys
growing up in these communities are at
great risk for delinquency; girls face pressure
for early sexual initiation and the risk
of sexual violence (Popkin, Leventhal, and
Weisman 2007). All children are at risk for
dropping out of school and having trouble
finding work. Severely distressed public
housing developments like the ones HOPE
VI targets are among the worst environments
for children—and adults—in the
nation; their residents are very likely to
suffer some of the worst consequences of
concentrated poverty.
The HOPE VI Panel Study tracked the
experiences of a sample of 887 original residents
from five developments slated for
revitalization in 1999 and 2000 (see text
box on page 11). At baseline in 2001, survey
respondents at all five sites reported intolerable
conditions. Across the sites, virtually
all (90 percent) residents reported serious
problems with social disorder—drug trafficking,
drug use, and gang activity. Even
worse, about 75 percent viewed violent
crime (shooting, assaults, and rape) as "big
problems" (Popkin et al. 2002). In-depth
interview respondents described being
overwhelmed by the all-pervading drug
trafficking and gang activity, speaking of
bullets coming in their windows, children
caught in the crossfire, and the efforts they
had to make to shield their children from
the violence and disorder that surrounded
them.
(End of excerpt. The complete brief is available in PDF format.)
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.