urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Measuring Fiscal Disparities across the U.S. States

A Representative Revenue System/Representative Expenditure System Approach Fiscal Year 2002

Publication Date: November 29, 2006
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=311384
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).

The text below is a portion of the complete document.


Executive Summary

This report measures the fiscal disparities across the 50 states in fiscal year 2002 by looking at each state's revenue capacity, expenditure need, and overall level of fiscal capacity.1 Because tax authority and expenditure responsibilities are assigned to different levels of governments across different states, we combine information about revenues raised and expenditure needs for each state and its local governments.2 We use a methodology based on the underlying economic and demographic conditions found in the states rather than actual revenue and expenditure levels. A state's revenue capacity measures the resources its state and local governments can tap to finance public services. A state's expenditure need gauges the extent to which its state and local governments face conditions that raise or lower the cost of and need for public services. Fiscal capacity assesses each state's ability to raise revenues relative to its expenditure needs. This is the first such study undertaken by the Tax Policy Center in collaboration with the New England Public Policy Center at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Notes from this section of the report

1. The District of Columbia has been excluded from this study. D.C.'s characteristics resemble those of a municipality rather than a state; therefore, its results would not be comparable to those of other states. All "national" averages in this study are averages of the 50 states and exclude D.C. as well as other U.S. nonstate entities.

2. Thus, when we refer to a state we mean the state and all local governments, including counties, municipalities, townships, special districts, and school districts.

Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).


Topics/Tags: | Economy/Taxes


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page