No. A-69 in Series, "New Federalism: Issues and Options for States"
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).
The text below is a portion of the complete document.
Efforts to increase the participation of faith-based organizations (FBOs) in federally
funded social services are core components of President George W. Bush's domestic policies. But the last two Democratic candidates for president, Al Gore and John Kerry, also endorsed an expanded role for FBOs in federal programs, suggesting that policies to encourage FBO participation may continue under either party after President Bush leaves office.
We studied state and local contracting under three block grant programs with "Charitable Choice" provisions—Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment (SAPT), and the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG)—and one discretionary program aimed specifically at engaging FBOs in public contracting, the Compassion Capital Fund. All four programs are administered by the Department of Health and Human Services. Our findings draw on semistructured face-to-face interviews with public officials, program managers, and faith-based service providers in three cities—Birmingham, Boston, and Denver—selected for regional, religious, and demographic diversity. We conducted site visits between October 2004 and May 2005 and supplemented what we learned on site with follow-up telephone interviews and analysis of program and budget data.
The study offers an opportunity to compare FBO participation resulting from Charitable Choice legislation with FBO participation in initiatives that operate without legislative or regulatory guidance and without the involvement of state or local government. It also provides an in-depth look
at the role of faith in publicly funded programs. Acompanion paper (Kramer et al. 2005) provides more extensive discussion of our findings.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.