The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full article in PDF format.
©2007 William G. Gale, Jonathan Gruber, and Seth Stephens-Davidowitz
Abstract
Americans are taught from an early age to aspire to homeownership, and several long-standing federal institutions and regulations support owner-occupied residential housing. The income tax deduction for mortgage interest payments is possibly the best-known federal housing policy. Evidence suggests, however, that the mortgage interest deduction (MID) does little if anything to encourage homeownership. We propose a tax credit and a subsidized saving vehicle for first-time home buyers, financed by the elimination of the MID. Relative to current policy or to the President's Advisory Panel's recommendations, our proposals would be less expensive, more progressive, and more effective in encouraging homeownership.
Introduction
Owning one's home is widely viewed as an integral
part of the American dream. Americans are taught from
an early age to aspire to homeownership, and several
long-standing federal institutions and regulations support
owner-occupied residential housing.
The income tax deduction for mortgage interest payments
is possibly the best-known federal housing policy
and is deeply ingrained in the economic and social fabric
of the country. Evidence suggests, however, that the
mortgage interest deduction (MID) does little if anything
to encourage homeownership. Instead, it serves mainly
to raise the price of housing and land and to encourage
people who do buy homes to borrow more and to buy
larger homes than they otherwise would. Most tax return
filers, especially those with low or moderate incomes, do
not itemize their deductions and therefore are not in a
position to take advantage of the deduction if they were
to buy a home. As a result, the deduction not only drains
significant revenues from the Treasury every year, it also
provides much larger benefits to high-income households
than to low- or moderate-income households, and
has at best a small effect on homeownership.
In light of those concerns, the President's Advisory
Panel on Federal Tax Reform (2005) suggested major
changes to the once politically sacrosanct MID. The panel
proposed changing the deduction to a 15 percent credit
and making it available to all filers, regardless of itemization
status. Those proposals would partially address
some of the problems noted above.
While we believe the panel's proposals regarding the
MID would be a step in the right direction, we advocate
bolder changes in federal housing policy. We propose a
tax credit and a subsidized saving vehicle for first-time
home buyers, financed by the elimination of the MID.
Relative to current policy or to the panel's recommendations,
our proposals would be less expensive, more
progressive, and more effective in encouraging homeownership.
The report is organized as follows. Parts II and III
provide background information on U.S. homeownership
rates and federal housing policies, respectively. Part
IV discusses the underlying justification for encouraging
homeownership through public policy. Part V discusses
the economic effects of the MID. Parts VI and VII describe
our two proposed alternative policies and describe their
potential effects. Part VIII is a short conclusion.
(End of excerpt. The full article is available in PDF format.)
Usage and reprints: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site and may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact publicaffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.
Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute.