urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

National Tax Levels And the Rich vs. the Poor

Publication Date: June 06, 2005
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=1000793
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

© TAX ANALYSTS. Reprinted with permission.

Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).


The Congressional Budget Office reported that U.S. federal (central government) revenues declined from 18.1 percent to 16.3 percent of gross domestic product (1994-2004). While there are several caveats to be made before drawing policy conclusions regarding national tax/GDP ratios, one of the lessons from the global tax literature is that tax/GDP distinguishes a ‘‘rich’’ vs. ‘‘poor’’ country. Because of its higher (and steadier) tax/GDP ratio, the rich group is much better able to carry out the national (central) government role in promoting macroeconomic stability, and economic growth and development.

The data in the following two tables provide two perspectives on the higher tax effort by high income countries.

The first set of comparisons are made for OECD vis-à-vis regions for the period 1990-2000 (Figure 1). Some interesting first-glance relationships are revealed:

  • The national tax/GDP ratios of the ‘‘rich’’ OECD countries are consistently higher than that of poor/developing country regions. Moreover, the OECD average of 20 percent to 22 percent of GDP is relatively constant over the decade.
  • For the Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECA) countries that have been making the transition from a command to a market economy, there has been a downward 1990s adjustment to a reduced level of national taxation. Whether a more OECD-like pattern will emerge in the next decade is (particularly from the Central European EU Accession countries), of course, yet to be seen.
  • The South Asian region (SAR, 7 percent) and East Asia and the Pacific (EAP, 12.7 percent) display relatively low and declining tax efforts.
  • The tax/GDP of Africa (AFR), Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), and the Middle East and North Africa (MNA) is growing, albeit unevenly.
  • By reorganizing the country groupings into a series of four ‘‘low ‘‘ to ‘‘high’’ country income categories, one can get a better view of national tax mobilization in the rich vs. poor parts of the globe. Here there is an even clearer pattern showing that higher-income countries make a higher tax effort than do lower-income countries (Figure 2). This is generally true across all income levels and for all three years (1990, 1995, and 2000). The gap in tax performance is significant: In 1995 — the year with the most observations across the four income groups — the tax-GDP ratios ranged from 13 percent in low-income countries to approximately 19 percent in high-income countries.

    Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).


    The Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, provides independent, timely, and accessible analysis of current and emerging tax policy issues for the public, journalists, policymakers, and academic researchers. For more tax facts, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts.


    Topics/Tags: | Economy/Taxes


    The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

    Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

    Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

    Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

    If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

    Email this Page