© TAX ANALYSTS. Reprinted with permission.
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).
Net savingthat is, saving after subtracting depreciation on existing physical assetsis a key determinant of long-term economic growth. Higher levels of net saving increase the accumulation of capital by Americans, and thereby raise future national income. In 2003, net national saving amounted to 1.8 percent of net national product (NNP), the lowest share since 1934.
Net national saving can be divided into two components: saving done by the private sector and saving done by the government. In 2003 the private sector saved 6 percent of NNP, while the government dis-saved 4.3 percent of NNP.
Net saving in the private sector can be further broken down into saving undertaken by corporations (that is, undistributed profits) and saving undertaken by households (that is, spending less than income). In 2003, corporate net saving amounted to 4.3 percent of NNP, while household net saving amounted to 1.8 percent of NNP.
The chart below shows net saving by sector over time. Government net saving rose dramatically during the 1990s and has declined by a stunning 7 percent of NNP since its peak in 2000. The corporate saving rate has been relatively stable, generally fluctuating between 2 percent and 4 percent of NNP during the postwar era. Household net saving has declined substantially, from more than 8 percent of NNP in 1980 to 1.8 percent in 2003.
These figures are based on saving as officially measured in the national income and product accounts. It is important to recognize that what should be included in saving (for example, capital gains) depends on the issue under examination. Furthermore, the sectoral division of a given amount of saving sometimes requires rules that can be arbitrary and potentially misleading.
For example, the component of interest payments from businesses to households that reflects compensation for inflation is not distinguished from the inflation-adjusted component.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in the Portable Document Format (PDF).
The Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, provides independent, timely, and accessible analysis of current and emerging tax policy issues for the public, journalists, policymakers, and academic researchers. For more tax facts, see http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts.
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.