urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Reforming the Medicaid Disproportionate Share Program in the 1990s

Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageE-mail
Document date: January 01, 2000
Released online: January 01, 2000
Since 1991, three federal laws have sought to reform the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) program, which is designed to provide financial support to safety net hospitals. The article provides findings from a 40-state survey about Medicaid DSH and upper payment limit programs in 1997. Results indicate that the overall size of the DSH program did not increase from 1993 to 1997, but the composition of the DSH revenues and expenditures changed substantially: A much higher share of DSH funds were being paid to local hospitals and relatively less was being retained by states. The study also revealed that large differences in states’ use of DSH still persist. Finally, the survey indicated that a growing number of states established upper payment limits programs in the late 1990s. (Health Care Financing Review 2000 Winter; 22(2):137-158).


Topics/Tags: | Health/Healthcare


Usage and reprints: Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site and may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact publicaffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute.

Email this Page