urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Homelessness

 
Viewing 1-5 of 96. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

The Corporation for Supportive Housing's Returning Home Initiative: System Change Accomplishments after Three Years (Policy Briefs)
Martha R. Burt, Jocelyn Fontaine, Caterina Gouvis Roman

In 2006, the Corporation for Supportive Housing launched its Returning Home Initiative (RHI) with two goals: 1) to establish permanent supportive housing as an essential reentry component for formerly incarcerated persons with histories of homelessness, mental illness, and chronic health conditions; and 2) to promote local and national policy changes to integrate the corrections, housing, mental health, and human service systems. The Urban Institute assessed the process of system change stimulated by RHI activities in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago—three communities receiving significant RHI investment. This brief summarizes the influence of RHI-funded activities in each of these cities.

Posted to Web: February 08, 2010Publication Date: November 01, 2009

Targeting Chronically Homeless Veterans with HUD-VASH (Policy Briefs/Metropolitan Housing and Communities)
Mary K. Cunningham

Hundreds of veterans are sleeping on the street or in the emergency shelter system in the District of Columbia. This brief examines data from the vulnerability index survey, completed by the DC Department of Health and Human Services and Common Ground, a nonprofit supportive housing provider. These data indicate that homeless veterans in DC have numerous health problems, leaving them highly vulnerable to premature mortality. The DC Veteran Affairs Medical Center should prioritize these highly vulnerable homeless veterans for HUD-VASH vouchers, which link housing subsidies with supportive services.

Posted to Web: December 09, 2009Publication Date: August 01, 2009

Do Neighborhoods Matter? (Video Podcasts / Sound Policy)
George Galster

George Galster explains how children are harmed by growing up in predominantly poor neighborhoods. He also recommends ways to improve federal and state housing programs to avoid high concentrations of poverty. George Galster is an Urban Institute Affiliated Scholar and the Clarence B. Hilberry Professor of Urban Affairs at Wayne State University.

Posted to Web: November 18, 2009Publication Date: November 18, 2009

Permanent Supportive Housing in the District of Columbia: Taking Stock and Looking Forward (Policy Briefs/In Brief)
Martha R. Burt, Sam Hall

With the generous support of the William S. Abell Foundation, the Urban Institute (UI) surveyed District permanent supportive housing (PSH) agencies and specific PSH projects, asking their staff to detail current projects and future ambitions. This research brief is an analysis of the stock of PSH in the District as of early fall 2008, demographic information on PSH tenants at that time, and a look at how the District might move forward toward fulfilling its commitment to create 2,500 new units of PSH and ultimately eliminating chronic homelessness.

Posted to Web: September 04, 2009Publication Date: August 25, 2009

Academic Perspectives on the Future of Public Housing: Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity (Testimony)
Susan J. Popkin

Many policy makers and scholars regard the HOPE VI Program as one of the nation's most successful urban redevelopment programs (c.f. Katz 2009; Cisneros 2009). But despite its very real accomplishments, the HOPE VI program's record in meeting the needs of the original residents who endured the worst consequences of the failures of public housing is mixed. With its proposed "Choice Neighborhoods" initiative, the Obama administration has the opportunity to build on the experiences of nearly two decades of experience with HOPE VI. Incorporating intensive case management and permanent supportive housing for the most vulnerable into Choice Neighborhoods and any other comprehensive redevelopment efforts is one way to ensure that these initiatives truly meet the needs of all public housing families.

Posted to Web: July 29, 2009Publication Date: July 29, 2009

 Next Page >>
Email this Page