State Discipline of Physicians: Assessing State Medical Boards through Case Studies

State Medical Boards that license and discipline physicians play an important and insufficiently studied role in medical quality assurance. Only Boards can limit or remove a physician's license to practice, and this project used six case studies and available national data to assess their role in disciplining physicians. The main disciplinary process is complaint-driven investigation and administrative prosecution. Cases proceed through intake, investigation, pre-hearing preparations, and hearings, and problems and performance vary by stage. Several methods appear to improve the throughput and timeliness of conventional discipline, and Boards are experimenting with some promising alternatives to conventional practice. (This report is available in its entirety at http://aspe.hhs.gov/search/daltcp/Reports/2006/stdiscp.pdf)

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@ui.urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.