This paper contrasts changes that took place among urban safety net hospitals (SNHs) during the period 1990 to 1997 with changes that occurred at other urban facilities. We use data from American Hospital Association Annual Survey and define three groups of SNHs based on 1990 provision of uncompensated care (UC): those that provided a large share of UC in their market; those for which UC imposed a burden because it represented a large share of their expenses; and those meeting both conditions. We found that, through 1997, high market share/high burden SNHs lost service volume relative to non-SNHs, but did not undertake reductions in staffing levels and expenses or reduce UC. High market share only hospitals were similar to non-SNHs, but reduced their UC market share and were more likely to enter into a merger. High burden only SNHs were most likely to close, but those that remained open experienced growth in volume and maintained their financial position. (Health Affairs 2001 July/August; 20(4):159-168)
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required. Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@ui.urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.
Disclaimer: The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.