urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Health Insurance

 
Viewing 1-5 of 644. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

The Cost of Failure to Enact Health Reform: 2010 - 2020 (Updated) (Research Report)
Bowen Garrett, Matthew Buettgens, Lan Doan, Irene Headen, John Holahan

This report assesses the changes in coverage patterns and health care costs that will occur nationally if major reforms are not enacted. The authors find that by 2015, there could be 59.7 million people uninsured. The number could swell to 67.6 million by 2020, up from an estimated 49.4 million in 2010. As premiums nearly double, employees in small firms would see offers of health insurance almost cut in half, dropping from 41 percent of firms offering insurance in 2010 to 23 percent in 2020. Individual spending could jump 34 percent by 2015 and 79 percent by 2020.

Posted to Web: March 15, 2010Publication Date: March 15, 2010

The Cost of Uncompensated Care with and without Health Reform (Policy Briefs/Timely Analysis of Health Policy Issues)
John Holahan, Bowen Garrett

In this report the authors estimate that under the health reform bill passed by the Senate, the cost of uncompensated care will fall from $62.1 billion in 2009 to $46.6 billion in 2019. If no health reform is enacted, they project that uncompensated care would rise to between $107 and $141 billion in 2019. Over the six-year period of proposed health reform legislation, 2014–2019, the costs of uncompensated care without health reform would be between $560 and $700 billion. With reform, the cost would be $330 billion under the Senate bill and provide substantive savings to each level of government.

Posted to Web: March 10, 2010Publication Date: March 09, 2010

How Will Comparative Effectiveness Research Affect the Quality of Health Care? (Policy Briefs/Timely Analysis of Health Policy Issues)
Elizabeth Docteur, Robert A. Berenson

Building on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, health reform legislation would develop an infrastructure for the ongoing generation and dissemination of information on the comparative effectiveness, where "comparative effectiveness" has been defined as the study of methods to prevent, diagnoses, treat, and monitor A clinical condition or improve delivery of care to assist consumers, clinicians, purchasers, and policy makers to make informed decisions to improve health care at both individual and population levels. The issue brief explores the concept and describes areas of controversy that need to be addressed to make comparative effectiveness research successful.

Posted to Web: March 03, 2010Publication Date: February 15, 2010

THE BIGGEST LOSERS, HEALTH EDITION: Who Would Be Hurt the Most by a Failure to Enact Comprehensive Reforms? (Policy Briefs/Timely Analysis of Health Policy Issues)
Linda J. Blumberg

This brief describes the groups with the most to lose if comprehensive health care reform is not enacted—people who either lack coverage today or who are required to pay the most for health insurance and medical care. These include the self-employed, those working for small employers, those with health problems, older working-age adults and early retirees, the low-incomes, and others without access to employer-based insurance. Reform's combination of Medicaid expansions, subsidies for exchange-based coverage, broader-based sharing of risk, and administrative economies of scale would make meaningful coverage affordable for the vast majority of individuals disadvantaged by the current system.

Posted to Web: February 24, 2010Publication Date: February 24, 2010

Making Health Reform More Affordable for Working Families: The Effect of Employee Choice Vouchers (Research Report)
Matthew Buettgens, Linda J. Blumberg

Many low-income workers would be prevented from accessing subsidies under current health reform proposals if they are offered employer-sponsored health insurance (ESI). This report examines the effectiveness of two employee choice voucher options in making health care more affordable for such families. Findings show that employee choice vouchers would make health coverage dramatically more affordable for the low-income families who take advantage of them, would increase insurance coverage very modestly, and would not significantly change government or employer spending. The voucher programs considered would modestly reduce the number of people covered by ESI while having little effect on premiums.

Posted to Web: February 15, 2010Publication Date: February 12, 2010

 Next Page >>
Email this Page