Forty-five million nonelderly Americans were uninsured in 2007, and that was before the recession wiped out scores of jobs. Most laid-off workers likely lost their health insurance along with their incomes, and private coverage costs too much for many families to buy. And as medical costs soar, the price tag on promised Medicaid benefits is reaching unsustainable levels. These distress signals have put health care reform high on the president’s and policymakers' agendas. Read more.
Featured Links
healthpolicycenter.org UI's resource for health policy-related research, commentary and testimony
This brief examines the characteristics of the children who were eligible for Medicaid/CHIP in 2007. The results show that while participation rates were high in both Medicaid and CHIP, some 5 million remained uninsured despite being eligible for coverage. Participation rates, which were found to vary across areas, have likely increased given recent declines in the number of uninsured children. The brief also shows that while interest in public coverage is high among low-income parents, many do not know not know that their child is eligible for Medicaid/CHIP, do not know how to apply, and/or find the application process difficult.
This report uses the 2005 Kaiser Low-Income Coverage and Access Survey to examine low-income parents' perceptions of access and quality of care for the uninsured. The findings indicate that most low-income parents perceive that the uninsured do not have access to affordable medical and dental care and that the quality of care they receive is lower than for the insured. Low-income parents also have generally positive perceptions of Medicaid, indicating that efforts to increase eligibility and enrollment in Medicaid such as those included in current health care reform proposals would reduce uninsurance among this population.
Experts agree that the way health care is currently paid for in the United States, especially in the traditional, fee-for-service Medicare program, does not support coordinated care that is high quality and cost-efficient. To address these problems, policy-makers are taking a close look at accountable care organizations (ACOs).
This policy brief explores what ACO are, how they compare to previous reform concepts such as Health Maintenance Organizations and Provider Sponsored Organizations, key design and implementation issues, and opportunities and challenges.
The authors conclude that ACOs are no real game changers in the short term, but are nevertheless important to try.
Experts agree that the way health care is currently paid for in the United States, especially in the traditional, fee-for-service Medicare program, does not support coordinated care that is high quality and cost-efficient. To address these problems, policy-makers are taking a close look at accountable care organizations (ACOs).
This policy brief explores what ACO are, how they compare to previous reform concepts such as Health Maintenance Organizations and Provider Sponsored Organizations, key design and implementation issues, and opportunities and challenges.
The authors conclude that ACOs are no real game changers in the short term, but are nevertheless important to try.
In this special presentation, the United Kingdom’s secretary of state for health, the Rt. Hon. Andy Burnham, M.P., will argue that now is the time for England and America to share much-needed perspective and knowledge and to bust a medical myth or two.