urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Governing

town meetingUrban Institute researchers evaluate federal, state, and local government programs and policies. Early on, we pioneered performance-management techniques government agencies still use to evaluate and improve public services, from economic development to garbage collection. And now we're adapting those strategies for the nonprofit sector—at home and abroad. Read more.

Featured Links


Related Policy Centers

Viewing 1-5 of 507. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

Budgeting in the Ideal and in the United States (Commentary)
Rudolph G. Penner

Institute Fellow Rudy Penner describes how the U.S. budget is prepared by the executive branch and Congress, and how it then is implemented by the executive branch. The budget preparation process could be improved, Penner asserts, but budget implementation works smoothly and efficiently. The severe long-run budget problem the country faces is caused by only three spending programs: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. All are growing faster than the economy, and there is strong opposition against raising tax burdens. Changes are suggested for the budget process so that it is better suited for dealing with this long-run problem.

Posted to Web: February 01, 2010Publication Date: January 21, 2010

Public Expenditures on Children through 2008 (Fact Sheet / Data at a Glance)
Jennifer Ehrle Macomber, Julia Isaacs, Adam Kent, Tracy Vericker

Key facts are highlighted from several Urban Institute and Brookings Institution reports on public expenditures on children through 2008. Findings reveal that spending on children increased under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and other stimulus spending, but not proportionately to other federal spending. As ARRA expires, spending on children is projected to decline, assuming no change in current policies. Results also show that states and localities spent more money than the federal government did on children in 2004, except when it came to the youngest children, and that overall public investment (local, state, and federal) increases as children get older.

Posted to Web: January 14, 2010Publication Date: January 11, 2010

Lessons Unlearned? Who Pays for the Next Financial Collapse? (Series/The Government We Deserve)
C. Eugene Steuerle

It's an old story. Come a financial collapse, somebody's got to pay to get the nation's financial house back in order. While many on Wall Street made millions losing money for their companies, every young American is now saddled with tens of thousands of dollars of additional government debt. While buyers walked away from homes when they went underwater, others who had mustered large down payments simply absorbed their losses—in some cases, wiping out years of saving. While speculators who borrowed to buy stock or real estate shrugged off debt by declaring personal or corporate bankruptcy, those who invested in their 401(k)s helplessly watched their retirement savings erode.

Posted to Web: January 11, 2010Publication Date: January 11, 2010

Intentions and Results: A Look Back at the Adoption and Safe Families Act (Research Report)
Olivia Golden, Jennifer Ehrle Macomber, Additional Authors

The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA), signed into law on November 19, 1997, was the most significant piece of legislation dealing with child welfare in almost twenty years. The ambitious new law aimed to reaffirm the focus on child safety in case decision making and to ensure that children did not grow up in foster care but instead were connected with permanent families. Twelve years after the law was enacted, the Center for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP) in partnership with the Urban Institute co-sponsored this series of papers to examine effects of the ASFA law and its implementation.

Posted to Web: December 11, 2009Publication Date: December 10, 2009

 Next Page >>
Email this Page