View Research by Author - Rudolph G. Penner

More about Rudolph G. Penner's areas of expertise can be found on this Urban Institute expert's page.

Citation URL: http://www.urban.org/RudolphGPenner

Institute Fellow Rudolph Penner explains his grades for President Obama's efforts on controlling inflation and stimulating GDP growth, employment, and trade, in a commentary for The International Economy magazine.

The U.S. budget is on an unsustainable path. That is because Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, which together constituted almost one half of noninterest spending before the recent stimulus plan, are all growing faster than tax revenues. If these programs are not reformed, tax burdens raised, or other spending decimated, deficits and the national debt will explode. It is difficult to imagine solving the entire budget problem by slowing spending growth, because benefits would then be far below those previously promised. It is equally unlikely that tax increases could solve the whole problem because the tax burden would then be so far above any ever experienced by Americans. To the extent that tax burdens are to be increased, there are three options. Tax rates could be raised in the existing system, but that would be extremely inefficient. Tax reform might raise revenues more efficiently, but that is excruciatingly difficult politically. That leaves the possibility of a brand new tax and a VAT is a very likely candidate.

Institute Fellow Rudy Penner questions the costs and after-effects of heavy economic stimulus. There is a path out of our misery, he says, but it is surrounded by big and little mines, some of which have been planted by public policy.

The article considers special federal tax provisions affecting the elderly. It examines the taxation of Social Security, private retirement accounts, estate taxation and other provisions of the law that mention age. It also analyzes how the elderly might be affected by tax increases necessitated by the dismal long-run budget outlook. In particular, it looks at the possibility that we shall become more reliant on consumption taxes.

Two former directors of the Congressional Budget Office now at the Urban Institute join scholars from other organizations in a memo advising President Obama on how to balance the nation’s short- and long-term economic needs. To reduce escalating future deficits without endangering near-term recovery, the authors’ recommendations include action to stem the growth of Social Security and Medicare.

The prevalent theme in recent discussions of stimulus is that the risk of doing too little exceeds the risk that we shall do too much. But we must ask how much of too much we can tolerate. The risks of overdoing it are severe and are not emphasized enough in the current discussion. The main worries are that the speed with which the national debt is being increased could eventually cause a very rapid rise in interest rates on Treasuries and that federal, state and local bureaucracies may not be able to manage the proposed huge increase in spending. Turning to the long run, the testimony discusses the need to address short- and long-term budget problems simultaneously and the prospects for using the Conrad-Gregg commission to do so.

The new president will inherit a terrible economic and budget situation. It is uncertain exactly how much government debt will be issued in fiscal 2009, but it is certain that the amount relative to GDP will break the post World War II record by a large margin. The amount could exceed $1.4 trillion or 10 percent of GDP. The previous record was 5 percent of GDP in 1983. Financial markets will absorb this debt more easily if President Obama combines his short-run initiatives with a long-term plan to deal with the rapid growth of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. It is more likely, however, that he will proceed cautiously, saying a few things about the long run, but focusing more intently on a short-run stimulus.

This paper estimates the ratio of post- to pre-retirement consumption to explore how well boomers are prepared for retirement. I show that some of the poorest households are best prepared because they can maintain consumption by relying almost solely on Social Security while many of the most affluent households are poorly prepared because they will experience a decline in consumption upon retiring. Nonetheless, affluent households will be able to maintain a consumption level many times that of poor households. The paper discusses whether equalization of pre- and post-retirement consumption provides a useful adequacy yardstick at all income levels.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette op-ed, September 28, 2008. The current financial crisis poses a severe threat to the economy, but it also creates a tremendous opportunity, writes Rudolph Penner in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. It gives politicians cover for undertaking painful actions to get the long-run deficit under control-actions that should have been taken long ago.

Senior Fellow Rudolph Penner, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, sizes up the problems ahead and argues for fiscal reform. As baby boomers retire and health care costs keep rising, spending for Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will grow faster than federal revenues, pushing the deficit to an unmanageable size. The solutions—changes in spending and tax policy—are politically charged, but crucial and unavoidable.

Return to list of authors