urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

View Research by Author - Mark Woolley

Citation URL: http://www.urban.org/MarkWoolley


Viewing 1-6 of 6. Most recent posts listed first.

Housing in the Nation's Capital 2007 (Research Report)
Margery Austin Turner, G. Thomas Kingsley, Kathryn L.S. Pettit, Mary Kopczynski Winkler, Barika X. Williams, Mark Woolley

This is the sixth in a series of annual reports about housing in the Washington metropolitan region. It assembles and analyzes the most current data on housing conditions and trends in the District of Columbia and the surrounding suburbs. Last year's report focused on linkages between housing and schools in the District of Columbia and the metropolitan region. This year's report takes a regional perspective, examining how the region addresses housing for special needs populations. More specifically, the report assesses the housing options and services available to the elderly, disabled, and homeless and explores the consequences and opportunities for housing policy across the region.

Posted to Web: November 29, 2007Publication Date: November 29, 2007

Estimating the Public Costs and Benefits of HOPE VI Investments: Methodological Report (Research Report)
Margery Austin Turner, Mark Woolley, G. Thomas Kingsley, Susan J. Popkin, Diane K. Levy, Elizabeth Cove

The HOPE VI program has invested over $6 billion in federal funds for the redevelopment of severely distressed public housing. Drawing on the existing research evidence, this study systematically compares the costs (both monetary and nonmonetary) of maintaining severely distressed public housing developments to the potential costs and benefits of effectively revitalizing them. An effective redevelopment strategy can dramatically improve living conditions for families, resulting in better physical and mental health and increased employment and earnings. Moreover, redevelopment can trigger the revitalization of previously blighted communities. These outcomes also save public resources. In fact, for a typical distressed public housing project, mixed-income redevelopment can save the public more than $20 million over 20 years.

Posted to Web: July 16, 2007Publication Date: June 01, 2007

Relocation Is Not Enough: Employment Barriers among HOPE VI Families (Policy Briefs/Metropolitan Housing and Communities)
Diane K. Levy, Mark Woolley

In addition to providing residents with an improved living environment, the HOPE VI program seeks to help them attain self-sufficiency. However, while there have been dramatic improvements in quality of life, there have been no overall changes in employment. HOPE VI residents' poor health impedes their ability to work. Efforts that address physical and mental health and other key barriers, such as education and safe, affordable child care availability, could prove more effective than job training or placement efforts alone in improving the chances that former and current public housing residents move into employment or retain jobs they already have.

Posted to Web: June 26, 2007Publication Date: June 26, 2007

School Facility Investments in the Washington Metropolitan Area (Research Report)
Mark Woolley, Mary Kopczynski Winkler

Despite evidence that the quality of a school building affects student academic performance, most public schools in Washington, D.C.; Maryland; and Virginia are in poor physical condition. This brief analyzes patterns of investment for public school construction in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area from 1995 to 2004. The greatest investment was for new school construction in the outlying suburbs. Spending increased over time throughout the region, led by large increases in renovation construction expenditures within the District of Columbia. Schools with high proportions of minority and low-income students received less investment on average.

Posted to Web: May 03, 2007Publication Date:

Severely Distressed Public Housing: The Costs of Inaction (Research Report)
Margery Austin Turner, Mark Woolley, G. Thomas Kingsley, Susan J. Popkin, Diane K. Levy, Elizabeth Cove

The HOPE VI program has invested over $6 billion in federal funds for the redevelopment of severely distressed public housing. Drawing on the existing research evidence, this study systematically compares the costs (both monetary and nonmonetary) of maintaining severely distressed public housing developments to the potential costs and benefits of effectively revitalizing them. An effective redevelopment strategy can dramatically improve living conditions for families, resulting in better physical and mental health and increased employment and earnings. Moreover, redevelopment can trigger the revitalization of previously blighted communities. These outcomes also save public resources. In fact, for a typical distressed public housing project, mixed-income redevelopment can save the public more than $20 million over 20 years.

Posted to Web: March 30, 2007Publication Date: March 01, 2007

Housing in the Nation's Capital 2006 (Research Report)
Margery Austin Turner, G. Thomas Kingsley, Kathryn L.S. Pettit, Jennifer Comey, Barika X. Williams, Mark Woolley, Jessica Cigna

This is the fifth in a series of annual reports that analyzes the most current data on housing conditions and trends in the District of Columbia and the surrounding suburbs. This year's report focuses on linkages between housing and schools in the District of Columbia and the metropolitan region. The availability and quality of public schools play a critical role in shaping demand for housing, and, correspondingly, housing market trends shape school enrollment patterns. To explore these issues, this report reviews trends in housing and public school enrollment in the Washington region, with more in-depth coverage of the District's neighborhoods.

Posted to Web: October 25, 2006Publication Date: October 25, 2006

 

Return to list of authors

Email this Page