urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

View Research by Author - Leonard E. Burman

Leonard E. Burman


Director
Tax Policy Center

Leonard Burman is the Director of the Tax Policy Center, a Professor of Public Administration and International Affairs at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University, and senior research associate at Syracuse University?s Center for Policy Research. He co-founded the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, in 2002. He has held high-level positions in both the executive and legislative branches, serving as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis at the Treasury from 1998 to 2000, and as Senior Analyst at the Congressional Budget Office. He is past-president of the National Tax Association. Burman is the author of Taxes in America: What Everyone Needs to Know, with Joel Slemrod, and The Labyrinth of Capital Gains Tax Policy: A Guide for the Perplexed, co-editor of Taxing Capital Income and Using Taxes to Reform Health Insurance, and author of numerous articles, studies, and reports. Burman?s recent research has examined US federal budget dynamics, tax expenditures, financing long-term care, the individual alternative minimum tax, the changing role of taxation in social policy, and tax incentives for savings, retirement, and health insurance. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota and a B.A. from Wesleyan University.

Publications


Viewing 1-10 of 181. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

The Tax Reform That Just Won't Die and Shouldn't (Article)
Leonard E. Burman

This paper provides an historical overview of tax reform with an eye toward identifying conditions that would make successful reform plausible in the near future. Burman begins by analyzing the environment that led to tax reform in 1986 and posits that successful reform would require strong leadership from the White House, bipartisan support, and a new source that would make possible substantial income tax rate cuts—all of this while addressing the concerns of Republicans that new revenues would fuel a growth in government and of Democrats about progressivity. He argues that the new revenue source should be a value-added tax with proceeds earmarked to pay for government health care. This could slow healthcare spending because the tax would stimulate efforts to find cost savings, would result in a more efficient revenue system, and would go a long way towards addressing our long term budget imbalances.

Posted to Web: April 24, 2014Publication Date: April 24, 2014

Taxes and Inequality (Research Report)
Leonard E. Burman

This paper reviews historical trends in economic inequality and tax policy’s role in reducing it. It documents the various reasons why income inequality continues to rise, paying particular attention to the interplay between regressive and progressive federal and state taxes. The report also considers the trade-off between the social welfare gains that a more equal distribution of incomes would provide, and the economic costs of using the tax system to reduce inequality, highlighting the fact that income inequality reflects an amalgam of factors. The optimal policy response reflects that complexity.

Posted to Web: March 20, 2014Publication Date: March 20, 2014

Policies to Support the Middle Class: Testimony before the Senate Committee on Finance (Testimony)
Leonard E. Burman

In this testimony before the Senate Finance Committee, Len Burman outlines some of the challenges facing the middle class in 2014 and explores policy options that might help better equip them to meet those challenges, including improving access to higher education and job training and consolidating and targeting education tax subsidies; slowing the growth of spending on health care; eliminating the carried interest loophole; encouraging saving by offering automatic contributions to 401(k)-like accounts for low- and moderate-income households; and replacing automatic price indexing with annual indexation adjustments designed to partially counterbalance changes in the distribution of income on a revenue-neutral basis.

Posted to Web: March 13, 2014Publication Date: March 13, 2014

Preliminary Analysis of The Family Fairness and Opportunity Tax Reform Act (Research Report)
Leonard E. Burman, Elaine Maag, Georgia Ivsin, Jeff Rohaly

Senator Mike Lee's Family Fairness and Opportunity Tax Reform Act (S.1616) would significantly expand tax benefits for children, repeal the alternative minimum tax, and repeal the Affordable Care Act surtaxes on earnings and net investment income. To partially offset the cost of these provisions, the plan would consolidate filing statuses and tax brackets and repeal itemized deductions other than those for charitable contributions and home mortgage interest. TPC estimates that the plan would reduce tax revenues by $2.4 trillion over the ten-year budget period, 2014-2023, and remove roughly 12 million tax units from the federal income tax rolls in 2014.

Posted to Web: March 04, 2014Publication Date: March 04, 2014

The War on Poverty Moves to the Tax Code (Article/Tax Facts)
Leonard E. Burman, Elaine Maag

In 1975, the federal income tax code joined the "War on Poverty" with the enactment of the earned income tax credit (EITC). Today, tax credits form some of the largest and most effective anti-poverty programs in the US. In 2012, the Census Bureau estimated that tax credits cut poverty (under a broad measure that includes the effect of programs like Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits and the EITC) by 3 percentage points – more than SNAP (1.6 points) and TANF (0.2 points). The tax credits cut child poverty by a whopping 6.7 percentage points.

Posted to Web: January 07, 2014Publication Date: January 06, 2014

Pathways to Tax Reform Revisited (Research Report)
Leonard E. Burman

There is widespread agreement that the income tax needs reform, although little agreement about how to do it. A common thread in most reform proposals is to slash most tax expenditures. A 1973 book by Stanley Surrey made the case that cuts in tax expenditures was the "pathway to tax reform." This paper revisits Surrey's pathway, examining various proposals to eliminate, reduce, or reformulate tax expenditures as part of tax reform, including limitations on tax expenditures, converting most tax expenditures to credits, and more radical reforms that would vastly reduce the number of return filers.

Posted to Web: July 11, 2013Publication Date: July 11, 2013

Tax Reform and the Tax Treatment of Capital Gains (Testimony)
Leonard E. Burman

Leonard Burman's testimony before the U.S. House of Representative's Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Finance Committee on tax reform and the tax treatment of capital gains.

Posted to Web: September 20, 2012Publication Date: September 20, 2012

Tax Reform to Encourage Growth, Reduce the Deficit, and Promote Fairness (Testimony)
Leonard E. Burman

Leonard Burman's testimony before the Senate Budget Committee on tax reform to encourage economic growth, reduce the federal deficit, and to promote fairness.

Posted to Web: March 02, 2012Publication Date: March 01, 2012

Tax Reform Options: Marginal Rates on High-Income Taxpayers, Capital Gains, and Dividends (Testimony)
Leonard E. Burman

Leonard Burman's testimony before the Senate Committee on Finance on tax reform options affecting high-income taxpayers.

Posted to Web: September 14, 2011Publication Date: September 14, 2011

Catastrophic Budget Failure (Research Report)
Leonard E. Burman, Katherine Lim, Jeff Rohaly, Joseph Rosenberg

Continuation of current U.S. fiscal policy will lead to an enormous accumulation of debt with potentially disastrous economic consequences. Exacerbated by the recent economic turmoil and fueled by the willingness of creditors to lend at very low interest rates, there is signifi cant risk that necessary fi scal reform will be put off. In this paper, we consider the causes, mechanisms, and macroeconomic fallout of a catastrophic budget failure — a situation in which markets’ perception of the credit worthiness of the U.S. government rapidly deteriorates, leaving it unable to access credit markets at any reasonable rate of interest and generating a high probability of the previously unthinkable: the U.S. government defaulting on its debt obligations.

Posted to Web: September 01, 2010Publication Date: September 01, 2010

 Next Page >>

Return to list of authors

Email this Page