Risk and Recovery: Documenting the Changing Risks to Family Incomes (Series/Perspectives on Low-Income Working Families)Using the 1996, 2001, and 2004 panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation, this brief examines the likelihood that nonelderly individuals in families with children experience substantial drops in family income and recoveries from such drops. Over 13 percent of families see their incomes fall by half at some point over the course of a year with the lowest- and highest-income families the most likely to experience a substantial income loss. Further, only two in five individuals recover to at least 100 percent of their pre-drop income in the year after the drop.
| Posted to Web: May 22, 2009 | Publication Date: May 01, 2009 |
Disabilities Among TANF Recipients: Evidence from the NHIS (Research Report)This project uses data from the 2005/2006 National Health Interview Survey to provide a profile of the prevalence of different types of disability and employment among TANF recipients. We find that prevalence of disability varies widely depending on the specific measure used. Using narrow and broad composite disability measures, anywhere from 10 to 40 percent of TANF recipients have a disability and almost one-fifth have a family member with a disability. Disability prevalence among Food Stamp recipients is similar to TANF but low-income mothers have lower prevalence on almost all measures. Employment among TANF recipients with disabilities is considerably lower than among recipients without disabilities.
| Posted to Web: May 14, 2009 | Publication Date: May 01, 2009 |
Working for Cents on the Dollar (Discussion Papers/Low Income Working Families)This paper uses data from the 2007 Survey of Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market to analyze whether wage differences among workers of different races and ethnicities in the low-skill labor market remain after controlling for individual, job, and employer characteristics. The employer-provided data include detailed information on job requirements and employer characteristics rarely available in household surveys. We find that black workers earn significantly less than white workers in the less-skilled labor market, and a significant difference (12 percent) remains even after controlling for worker, job, and employer characteristics.
| Posted to Web: March 25, 2009 | Publication Date: March 23, 2009 |
Job Differences by Race and Ethnicity in the Low-Skill Job Market (Policy Briefs/Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market)This brief uses data from the 2007 Survey of Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market to examine differences in the noncollege jobs held by workers of different races and ethnicities and the impact of these differences on wage rates.
| Posted to Web: February 17, 2009 | Publication Date: February 01, 2009 |
Entry-Level and Next-Step Jobs in the Low-Skill Job Market (Policy Briefs/Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market)This brief uses data from the 2007 Survey of Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market to explore differences between noncollege jobs that have few if any requirements and those for which either a high school degree, prior experience, or previous skills training is extremely important.
| Posted to Web: December 04, 2008 | Publication Date: November 01, 2008 |
Low-Skill Jobs, Work Hours, and Paid Time Off (Policy Briefs/Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market)This brief uses data from the 2007 Survey of Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market to examine the scheduling demands employers place on workers recently hired to fill noncollege jobs and to assess the availability of paid time off, sick leave and other benefits that help workers balance their work and family lives.
| Posted to Web: December 04, 2008 | Publication Date: November 01, 2008 |
Job Placement Agencies and the Low-Skill Labor Market (Policy Briefs/Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market)This brief uses data from the 2007 Survey of Employers in the Low-Skill Labor Market to describe the role job placement agencies play in helping employers fill noncollege jobs.
| Posted to Web: December 04, 2008 | Publication Date: November 01, 2008 |
Q&A: New Income and Poverty Statistics and the Social Safety Net (Opinion)| Gregory Acs, Linda J. Blumberg, Harry Holzer, Pamela J. Loprest, Jennifer Ehrle Macomber, Karin Martinson, Signe-Mary McKernan, Cynthia Perry, Caroline Ratcliffe, Margaret Simms, Margery Austin Turner, Shelley Waters Boots |
|
The Census Bureau released its annual report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage for the U.S. population on August 26, 2008. According to the report, median household income increased by 1.3 percent in 2007, while the overall poverty rate dipped slightly and the number and percentage of people without health insurance decreased. While the overall numbers were positive, not everyone shared in the economic gains. The number and percentage of children in poverty increased, and households in the lowest 40 percent of the income distribution had no significant income gains.
| Posted to Web: August 27, 2008 | Publication Date: August 27, 2008 |
Supporting Work for Low-Income People with Significant Challenges (Series/New Safety Net)Welfare programs require people to work, but some low-income adults struggle with major personal challenges that make it hard to find or hold down a job. In this essay, Loprest and Martinson recommend both short term changes to current programs and longer term efforts through a program for competitive federal matching block grants to states. These grants would support efforts to integrate programs that alleviate barriers to work with employment services and to evaluate these initiatives so policymakers can better understand what works.
| Posted to Web: July 16, 2008 | Publication Date: July 16, 2008 |
Supporting Work for Low-Income People with Significant Challenges - Summary (Series/New Safety Net)Welfare programs require people to work, but some low-income adults struggle with major personal challenges that make it hard to find or hold down a job. In this summary, Loprest and Martinson recommend both short-term changes to current programs and longer-term efforts through a program for competitive federal matching block grants to states. These grants would support efforts to integrate programs that alleviate barriers to work with employment services and to evaluate these initiatives so policymakers can better understand what works.
| Posted to Web: July 16, 2008 | Publication Date: July 16, 2008 |