urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Research by Author & Topic

Publications by Caroline Ratcliffe on Poverty and Safety Net

Viewing 1-10 of 22. Most recent listed first.Next Page >>

Are Families Prepared for Financial Emergencies? (Article/Opportunity and Ownership Facts)
Caroline Ratcliffe, Katie Vinopal

Data from the 2007 Survey of Consumer Finances show a disturbing reality. Even prior to the current recession, many families did not have enough assets to see them through a modest spell of unemployment or another financial emergency. In 2007, nearly one in three U.S. families were liquid asset poor. Low-income, young, and nonemployed families are more vulnerable to economic emergencies. For example, two-thirds (68 percent) of bottom income quintile families and 47 percent of second income quintile families are liquid asset poor, while such shortfalls affect only 1 percent of top income quintile families.

Posted to Web: September 17, 2009Publication Date: September 01, 2009

Transitioning In and Out of Poverty (Fact Sheet / Data at a Glance)
Signe-Mary McKernan, Caroline Ratcliffe, Stephanie R. Cellini

Slightly more than half of the U.S. population experiences poverty at some time before age 65. Roughly half of those who get out of poverty will become poor again within five years. Who is more likely to enter poverty? How long are people poor? And what events are associated with falling into and climbing out of poverty? This fact sheet summarizes key findings from the poverty dynamics literature to describe how, why, and when people move in and out of poverty.

Posted to Web: September 10, 2009Publication Date: September 10, 2009

The Minnesota Integrated Services Project (Research Report)
Karin Martinson, Caroline Ratcliffe, Katie Vinopal, Joanna Parnes

The Minnesota Integrated Services Projects focus on improving the delivery of employment, health, and social services to families who receive cash assistance and have serious or multiple barriers to employment. Operating in eight sites, the project seeks to provide comprehensive assessments of participants' barriers, improve access to more complete services that address multiple needs, and coordinate services provided by multiple service systems. This is the final report in an evaluation of the project and describes the changes in the economic outcomes and family-related outcomes of ISP participants over a two-year period, provides estimates of the relationship between ISP participation and participants' employment and MFIP outcomes, and provides conclusions and policy recommendations.

Posted to Web: March 20, 2009Publication Date: March 05, 2009

Q&A: New Income and Poverty Statistics and the Social Safety Net (Opinion)
Gregory Acs, Linda J. Blumberg, Harry Holzer, Pamela J. Loprest, Jennifer Ehrle Macomber, Karin Martinson, Signe-Mary McKernan, Cynthia Perry, Caroline Ratcliffe, Margaret Simms, Margery Austin Turner, Shelley Waters Boots

The Census Bureau released its annual report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage for the U.S. population on August 26, 2008. According to the report, median household income increased by 1.3 percent in 2007, while the overall poverty rate dipped slightly and the number and percentage of people without health insurance decreased. While the overall numbers were positive, not everyone shared in the economic gains. The number and percentage of children in poverty increased, and households in the lowest 40 percent of the income distribution had no significant income gains.

Posted to Web: August 27, 2008Publication Date: August 27, 2008

Enabling Families to Weather Emergencies and Develop (Series/New Safety Net)
Signe-Mary McKernan, Caroline Ratcliffe

Low-wage jobs can be unstable, leaving families struggling to cope with employment gaps and financial emergencies that can strike without warning. About four in five low-income families are "asset poor," lacking enough liquid savings to live for three months at the federal poverty level without earnings. In this essay, McKernan and Ratcliffe suggest a cluster of policies that would improve financial markets and savings opportunities for low-income families across the life cycle.

Posted to Web: July 16, 2008Publication Date: July 16, 2008

Enabling Families to Weather Emergencies and Develop - Summary (Series/New Safety Net)
Signe-Mary McKernan, Caroline Ratcliffe

Low-wage jobs can be unstable, leaving families struggling to cope with employment gaps and financial emergencies that can strike without warning. About four in five low-income families are "asset-poor," lacking enough liquid savings to live for three months at the federal poverty level without earnings. In this summary, McKernan and Ratcliffe suggest a cluster of policies that would improve financial markets and savings opportunities for low-income families across the life cycle.

Posted to Web: July 16, 2008Publication Date: July 16, 2008

Do Welfare and IDA Program Policies Affect Asset Holdings? (Policy Briefs/Opportunity and Ownership Project)
Signe-Mary McKernan, Caroline Ratcliffe, Yunju Nam

This brief presents an empirical analysis of how asset tests affect families’ asset holdings. The findings suggest that more lenient asset tests and more generous IDA program rules can lead families to increase their asset holdings. Relaxed vehicle asset limits, for example, are associated with increased vehicle ownership. Since people often need a reliable car to get to work, this finding suggests that exempting at least one vehicle in all states may increase employment and job stability among low-income families. The findings also suggest that restrictions on withdrawals and incentives built into restricted asset accounts and IDA programs may provide families with motivation to build assets.

Posted to Web: May 23, 2008Publication Date: May 07, 2008

The Effects of Welfare and IDA Program Rules on the Asset Holdings of Low-Income Families (Series/Poor Finances: Assets and Low Income Households)
Signe-Mary McKernan, Caroline Ratcliffe, Yunju Nam

This report examines the effects of a comprehensive set of 13 welfare, Food Stamp, individual development account (IDA), earned income tax credit (EITC), and minimum wage program rules on the asset holdings of low-education single mothers and families. This report finds empirical evidence that more lenient asset limits in means-tested programs and more generous IDA program rules may have positive effects on asset holdings of low-education single mothers and families.

Posted to Web: October 15, 2007Publication Date: October 10, 2007

Assessing Asset Data on Low-Income Households: (Series/Poor Finances: Assets and Low Income Households)
Caroline Ratcliffe, Henry Chen, Trina R. Williams-Shanks, Yunju Nam, Mark Schreiner, Min Zhan, Michael Sherraden

This report identifies the most reliable and informative data sources for understanding low-income households’ assets and liabilities, details their limitations, and provides options for improving asset data sources and collection methods. The report evaluates 12 data sets and identifies three as having the greatest potential for future asset research—the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID).

Posted to Web: October 15, 2007Publication Date: October 10, 2007

Minnesota Integrated Services Project (Research Report)
Karin Martinson, Caroline Ratcliffe, Elizabeth Harbison, Joanna Parnes

The Minnesota Integrated Services Projects focus on improving the delivery of employment, health, and social services to families who receive cash assistance and have serious or multiple barriers to employment. Operating in eight sites, the project seeks to provide comprehensive assessments of participants' barriers, improve access to more complete services that address multiple needs, and coordinate services provided by multiple service systems. This report examines the implementation of the projects, provides information on participants' demographic, economic and barrier-related characteristics, and describes changes in economic outcomes among participants within a short (six-month) follow-up period.

Posted to Web: September 25, 2007Publication Date: September 01, 2007

 Next Page >>
Email this Page