A Nonpartisan Economic and Social Policy Research Organization
Research
see the latest publications
Browse by Author
Browse by Topics

View Research by Author - Mark Coggeshall

Citation URL: http://www.urban.org/MarkCoggeshall


Viewing 1-4 of 4. Most recent posts listed first.

Community Collaboratives Addressing Youth Gangs: Interim Findings from the Gang Reduction Program (Research Report)
Author(s): Meagan Cahill, Mark Coggeshall, David Hayeslip, Ashley Wolff, Erica Lagerson, Michelle L. Scott, Elizabeth Davies, Kevin Roland, Scott DeckerPosted to Web: June 10, 2008

This report presents interim findings of the Urban Institute's evaluation of the Gang Reduction Program (GRP), a $10 million, multi-year, federal initiative to reduce gang crime in Los Angeles, California; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; North Miami Beach, Florida; and Richmond, Virginia. The evaluation found substantial variation in collaboration levels among partners in each site, but each site achieved significant implementation successes. The effects of GRP in each site were mixed, and only one site, Los Angeles, showed a significant reduction in crime levels. By late 2007, however, three sites had undertaken significant steps towards sustaining GRP beyond the federal funding period.

Publication Date: May 30, 2008Availability: HTML | PDF

Development of an Empirically-Based Risk Assessment Instrument (Research Report)
Author(s): Laura Winterfield, Mark Coggeshall, Adele V. HarrellPosted to Web: April 01, 2003

In 2001, the Urban Institute was commissioned by the District of Columbia Pretrial Services Agency (PSA) to develop a risk assessment instrument to assist its diagnosticians in recommending conditions of pretrial release. The instrument designed by the Urban Institute and described in this report serves two goals: 1) make the development of release recommendations more objective and consistent across defendants and improve the transparency of PSA processes, and 2) improve the accuracy of decision-making based on risk assessment. This instrument should increase public safety, reduce court costs associated with non-appearance, and reduce the number of low-risk defendants whose liberty is restricted.

Publication Date: April 01, 2003Availability: HTML | PDF

The Impact of Teen Court on Young Offenders (Research Report)
Author(s): Jeffrey A. Butts, Janeen Buck, Mark CoggeshallPosted to Web: April 15, 2002

This is the first report of findings from the Evaluation of Teen Courts (ETC) Project, which was conducted by the Urban Institute and funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The ETC Project studied teen courts in four States: Alaska, Arizona, Maryland, and Missouri. Researchers measured pre-court attitudes and post-court recidivism among more than 500 juveniles referred to teen court for non-violent offenses, such as shoplifting and vandalism. The study compared recidivism outcomes for teen court defendants with outcomes for youth handled by the regular juvenile justice system.

Publication Date: April 15, 2002Availability: HTML | PDF

Youth, Guns, and the Juvenile Justice System (Research Report)
Author(s): Jeffrey A. Butts, Mark Coggeshall, Caterina Gouvis Roman, Daniel P. Mears, Jeremy Travis, Michelle Waul, Ruth WhitePosted to Web: January 01, 2002

The falling rate of violent crime in the United States is not likely to reduce the need for effective policies and programs to address youth gun violence. The rate of firearm deaths among American youth is still one of the highest in the world. In the coming years, all levels of government, the private sector, and communities will require sound information and practical guidance as they try to reduce gun violence among young people. Funded by the Joyce Foundation, this report reviews recent trends in youth gun violence, policy responses to gun violence, and the growing variety of data resources for research on the effects of gun laws. The report is designed to inform discussions about these issues and to aid in the development of future research efforts.

Publication Date: January 01, 2002Availability: HTML | PDF

 

Return to list of authors

Email this Page